Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-07-2008, 09:50 AM
prova's Avatar
prova
Registered User

prova is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 490
2nd attempt at the Lagoon Nebula

Retrieved a little more data than my first attempt which was only 6mins worth, details on my 2nd shot are:

44 x 30sec subs @ ISO400, stacked in DSS and my first go at processing in PS.

Taken with Vixen ED115S and unmodded 350D

Comments welcome and thanks for looking.

Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M8.jpg)
183.8 KB64 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-07-2008, 10:09 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Looks good mate.

Perhaps next time try 22 @ iso 400 and 22 @ iso 800 with the same exposure time. that way you should get more nebulosity but still keep the core of the nebula intact (as it is in this image)

Also, dont be afraid to run off 10 darks after the imaging session... will make all the difference to the noise level... Maybe even run Noiseware (noise reduction program.. google it..) I've seen noiseware used to brilliant effect in astro images.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-07-2008, 12:00 PM
prova's Avatar
prova
Registered User

prova is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 490
Cheers Alex, I'll give that shot next time
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-07-2008, 01:50 PM
war bird's Avatar
war bird
Beam me up scotty

war bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Camberwell .vic
Posts: 50
Not bad at all mate,i still havent had chance at imaging the lagoon yet or anything in that region for that matter. Cant wait to try !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-07-2008, 03:13 PM
bluescope's Avatar
bluescope
I've got a Sirius eye !

bluescope is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Country W.A.
Posts: 1,587
Getting there mate !

Are you guiding yet ?

At iso 400 with an unmodded 350D you really need to be doing exposures of around 6 to 7 minutes. If you are not guiding you must have a very accurate polar alignment to do such long exposures. With guiding you will get away with less accurate alignment but it is still always better to have as good an alignment as you can.

When I used my unmodded 350D for unguided imaging I used to set at iso 800 when doing 30 sec exposures, it will make quite a difference to the detail you gather and the noise will not be too bad. When you go to iso1600 it makes a big difference to noise, not recommended.

Keep at it .... it just gets better the more you do it.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-07-2008, 05:48 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Oh dear, why 30sec?, why ISO400 at that short exposure time? and its purple?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-07-2008, 06:25 PM
prova's Avatar
prova
Registered User

prova is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Oh dear, why 30sec?, why ISO400 at that short exposure time? and its purple?
No guiding at the moment and it's my first processing attempt.
Still learning, I'll be able to get guiding going by the weekend then it should be a different story ... I hope!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-07-2008, 06:28 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
OK, after this weekend, no excusses
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement