Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-07-2008, 10:30 PM
Buddman's Avatar
Buddman (Adam)
Registered User

Buddman is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Landsborough, Queensland
Posts: 112
Reprocessed Triffid and Lagoon

Hi all,

I was mucking around with a friend taking shots through a Celestron 8 inch SCT last night and stumbled upon a different way of processing. I went back to some earlier images that we took through an ED80. Not sure of it's technical merits but so far I like the look of the final images.

Forgot to mention that the first image is the old version and the second one is the new version.
What do people think?

Adam
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (old Triffid.jpg)
196.9 KB44 views
Click for full-size image (new Triffid.jpg)
196.2 KB40 views
Click for full-size image (old Lagoon.jpg)
191.8 KB38 views
Click for full-size image (new Lagoon.jpg)
191.5 KB51 views

Last edited by Buddman; 12-07-2008 at 11:23 AM. Reason: Forgot to say which were the new versions
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2008, 10:44 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
color seems a bit off on M8, but everything else appears to be right on the money... focus, detail, depth.. all very nice indeed.

Great images Adam
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2008, 11:11 PM
Buddman's Avatar
Buddman (Adam)
Registered User

Buddman is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Landsborough, Queensland
Posts: 112
Thanks Alex, yeah I might have pushed the saturation a bit too far in M8.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-07-2008, 12:08 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,801
Adam, you seem to have the detail in your images, but i think you have over processed them a bit,don't worry I did the same for ages.

Having said that, it seems that you are quite capable of capturing the objects, so give plenty of time to the extracting of the data you have captured, just MHO.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2008, 11:30 AM
Buddman's Avatar
Buddman (Adam)
Registered User

Buddman is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Landsborough, Queensland
Posts: 112
Thanks Leon, I'm pretty happy with getting the shots at the moment. I reprocessed the images in about 5 minutes.

I am a High School Science teacher and I'm trying to find a student friendly (lazy and fast) way for them to do thier own processing. I agree that plenty of time is the best solution.

Adam
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2008, 12:04 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
I tend to rush out all my images too... My planetary images so far have been captured, processed and posted on here within 4 hours.. Im sure more careful processing would see them come out better...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-07-2008, 07:07 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
The first Triffid seems better to me than the 2nd and the 2nd Lagoon seems way better than the first.

The colour in the 2nd Lagoon looks spot on to me. There is a bit of blue reflection nebula that sorrounds the Lagoon. And the Lagoon has some H Beta which is magenta-ish.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement