Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:28 AM
loopy's Avatar
loopy
Resident Hypoxyphilliac

loopy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 69
Viewing Last Night

That was rather annoying - I had a big story written out and we just had a blackout...

Anyways, last night at around midnight, I gave up the option of sleep in favouring of going out onto the footy ovals and staring up in the sky. Things have definitely changed a lot in the last week - the full moon that was good to look at has gone (I think it's rising later?), but that'd paved the way for some ink black skies, for me predominately to the SE and E.
I tried the test in S&T for determining magnitude, and found about 10 or so stars inside Pegasus. From this, I guessed at about mag 6. I could also faintly see a small triangle of stars, just to the North of Eta Ori (the middle star in Orion's Belt) - two of them are approaching mag 5.5, and the other is between mag 5.5 and mag 7 (not exactly sure how bright), so that seemed to back it up. I'm really looking forward to viewing the skies back home (my parents live up in Daintree, FNQ), because I remember seeing a lot more stars when I looked up back there...
I started off as usual with just my naked eye, seeing how many star names and constellations I could remember from last time. From the North, swinging through East to south, I found Pegasus, Andromeda, Airies, the Pleiades, Taurus, Orion, Cannis Major, Carina, Crux and Centauri. Just to the south and slightly West of Canopus was the Large Magellanic, and further West was the Small Magellanic. Just to the edge of the SMC was a faint blob of light - it looked like a star, but was more a disc than a dot. I filed that one away in the memory banks to come back to later.
I could see a fair bit of milky way detail running through Carina, and just to the edge was another faint blob (it kind of made an equilateral traingle, looking at Canopus, LMC and this blob). I finally pulled out my bino's to check it out, and could see a decent sized cluster - NGC 2516. I'll definitely be coming back here with a scope, when I finally lay my hands on one
I turned the bino's back towards the LMC, and olong the edge of it, I could make out a bright spot. I think this must have been the Tarntula nebula, although I couldn't make any detail out of it.
That fuzzy spot over near the SMC was still bugging me, so I finally took a look over there, and there she was - 47 Tuc in all her glory I stared at it for a long time (maybe 10 minutes?) trying to get some individual detail on each of the stars, but I found it hard to hold the bino's steady enough. Again, this is somewhere I'll definitely revisit with a scope.
Next on the list was Eta Carinae, which I could identify as a bright little blob, surrounded by the cloud of the milky way. I followed the cloud around towards Orion (it didn't quite get that far), and along there way there were many "bright" patches, areas that stood out from the background. The whole lot of them made my "to do" list
Finally, I moved back over to Orion and had a look at M42. I've been watching this guy for a couple of months now, and it's amazing how much detail you can get on it, just from using binoculars. I can definitely see the "fan" shape, and allthough there's no colour there, I can make out differences in brightness and a very slight ammount of detail.
So that was my night last night - I saw some new things, learnt a lot and have more goals for next time I go out. Hopefully next time I can spend a bit longer out there - I live on a defence base, and only managed about 45 minutes out there before the MP's came up shining their torches in my eyes And hopefully next time will be just as much fun as this one.

Cheers,


Brad
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-12-2004, 08:35 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Excellent report Brad, and it's refreshing to read a naked eye and binoculars report, as opposed to a telescope based report. I only had my 11x70's for quite a while, about 6-7 months, before I got my scope so I know what's it like

Do you use a tripod? If not, you should definitely invest in one. I picked one up for $70 off ebay.. It needs to be fairly solid but you don't need to buy a manfrotto to hold 10x50's. The tripod really helps you pick out the extra detail because you can stare for longer without having the stars shaking about as your arms geet tried from holding them.

I remember looking at Omega Centauri and 47 Tuc with my binos, all they were was a fuzzy blob but it's still a nice looking fuzzy blob that's different than everything else around it.

I also love the open clusters in the binos, especially M6 and M7 back when Scorpius and Sag were up.

Great report, keep it up!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2004, 09:27 AM
Saturn%5's Avatar
Saturn%5 (Graeme)
Registered User

Saturn%5 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Launceston
Posts: 758
A Great report Brad, I hope to do a report here like that when the clouds go away (that would be your fault Mark) And now it is just starting to rain so it looks like it will be a few days yet for us in SE Queensland.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2004, 11:32 AM
loopy's Avatar
loopy
Resident Hypoxyphilliac

loopy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 69
Thanks guys

I've got a tripod for photography, but I guess I need an attachment to clip the bino's on? Incidently, that reminds me of a funny story... I was in one of the rather large camera shops in Perth yesterday, buying a backpack for my camera/laptop. They've got a rather big section of telescopes there (mostly Tasco's), so I thought I'd have a sticky beak. While I was looking, some old guy came up and started talking to me about the scopes. Straight away he took me over to a $119 60mm reflector and told me it was the bee's knees, and that it was the perfect scope for me. He pointed out a picture on the wall, and told me that he took that photo through this scope. Now the funny part was that the photo was actually a drawing, showing a black hole surrounding by an accretion disk with two large radio jets comming out of it. Even if it was a real picture, it would have had to have been imaged in the x-ray spectrum... all with a $119 reflector. I just smiled and left...

Cheers,


Brad
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2004, 11:43 AM
Mick's Avatar
Mick (Michael)
Registered User

Mick is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 1,098
Loved reading your report Brad, your of to a good start. Take your time and enjoy the spectacle, when you see all these wonders through a Telescope you will be amazed.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2004, 02:01 PM
Dave47tuc's Avatar
Dave47tuc (David)
IIS member 65

Dave47tuc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington peninsula. Victoria.
Posts: 1,658
That is a great report Brad,
When you are looking at the mighty 47tuc make sure you pop over to ngc 362, it is a very nice globular also.

One that most people pass by is ngc6752 this is a real show stopper. Comes in 3rd behind 47 and omega. It is in Pavo.
If it is to low for you now just wait till it comes around it well worth look at.

Best.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2004, 02:10 PM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
Excellent report, something special, I can sense from the reading your level of excitment. Keep it up.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-12-2004, 08:56 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Quote:
I've got a tripod for photography, but I guess I need an attachment to clip the bino's on?
Yep, they're called a tripod adapter, funnily enough

First, you have to make sure your binoculars have a tripod adapter thread.. some binoculars don't, but the more expensive ones definitely should.

I thought I had a picture of the tripod adapter but it appears I don't.. they range in prices, mine cost $15 from Kirks Camera Supplies (reseller of Saxon/Splendour Trading).

I'll take a picture for you tonight, if I remember
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-12-2004, 09:57 AM
loopy's Avatar
loopy
Resident Hypoxyphilliac

loopy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 69
Thanks mate - my bino's are Bushnell 10x50, but they don't have any thread on them?

Cheers,


Brad
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-12-2004, 08:27 PM
silvinator's Avatar
silvinator
Lady Post-a-holic

silvinator is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra, ACT, Australia
Posts: 448
nice report brad. it's always great to get out the trusty old binos. i still can't stop laughing over the x-ray imaging reflector. hahaha
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-12-2004, 08:34 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Brad,

check you binoc at the front on the hinge. Most smaller binoculars these days have a screw in plug at the front of the "hinge" where the tripod adapter screws in. If you have a Camera House in Perth they usually stock them (thats where I got mine).

Top review too
Paul
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement