Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 29-05-2008, 03:44 AM
monoxide's Avatar
monoxide
Registered User

monoxide is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 658
first light with my QHY-8 *reprocessed*

Hi guys,
after being beaten by the dew lastnight i decided i wasn't going to be beaten tonight and set up to image through the 6" instead of the ED80.
the only problem i had with this was that i don't have the spacer yet for my MPCC so LOTS of coma but theres not much i can do about that for now.

not only first light for the QHY8 but also my first time autoguiding, so this is really my first serious go at it and i'm pretty happy so far.

i wasn't really happy with the colour version i processed so i also processed the red channel separately as a RHa monochrome image and i'm much happier with that, i think this shows more detail but thats probably down to my lack of processing skills.

9x10 minute subs
6" newt + UHC-S filter, no mpcc.

i didn't feel like mucking about with compressed versions so....
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/l.../LagoonRGB.jpg
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/l...onRchannel.jpg

*RE-PROCESSED* - http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/l...eprocessed.jpg

Last edited by monoxide; 30-05-2008 at 03:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-05-2008, 04:55 AM
Kirkus's Avatar
Kirkus (Kirk)
Beginner-ish

Kirkus is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California, USA
Posts: 207
How nice is that!?

I was especially interested in these photos as I'm waiting for clear skies to try my first auto-guiding attempt. I'll also be using a 6" newt. This is a real encouragement for me, monoxide!! Thanks for sharing!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-05-2008, 04:59 AM
bluescope's Avatar
bluescope
I've got a Sirius eye !

bluescope is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Country W.A.
Posts: 1,587
Looks real good mono, well done for first serious go !

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-05-2008, 07:48 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
Very nice mate Nice details in the center. Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-05-2008, 07:58 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,786
Wow, top job mono - a terrific result especially for the 1st time auto guiding and 1st light!

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-05-2008, 08:07 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Beautiful first effort! Fast learner!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-05-2008, 09:06 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
TJ, I recall you saying in a previous post that you don't have good data to start with... I'd have to disagree. There is plenty of potential in what you have presented. 90mins of data should give a reasonable result. I sense you could perhaps push/stretch this image a little harder to bring out more nebulosity. Colours look good. Well done. Look forward to seeing more.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-05-2008, 09:43 AM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Hi TJ Very nice first light. Processing is everything with the CCD. A pretty steep learning curve but you are well on the way. Looks like you haven't struggled as much as me.
What I think you need:

More data (longer subs)
Better focus (Very dificult)
Less processing is sometimes better.

Keep at it . Looking Good
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-05-2008, 05:14 PM
monoxide's Avatar
monoxide
Registered User

monoxide is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 658
thanks guys, i really enjoyed it lastnight.
i think i underestimated the HEQ5, i've put a fair load on it and its guiding beautifully. As Doug said I think my focus could have been a touch better, this is probably because i only focused once at the start of the night. hopefully i can nail this with the motofocus.

Jase, this is my first set of 'good' data. minus the coma of course.
i think i had the offset a little low which is why i had trouble bringing out more detail, i'll have to experiment more with the capture settings to make it easier when it comes to the processing.
a set of darks and flats would probably help out a lot too.

i still really need to get a handle on the processing, at the moment i'm only sticking to really basic processing routines but i need to learn more to bring out the most i possibly can.

anyway, i'll get out there tonight and give it another bash on something different and see how i go.

Goodluck with your first light too Kirkus, hope you have as much fun as i did.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29-05-2008, 05:29 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
A lovely Lagoon Tj, well done.

I enjoyed the subtle colours and the dark globules stand out wonderfully. A very fine first light.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29-05-2008, 06:05 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Top work for a 1st light TJ, smooth. Flats are necessary methinks. You could sharpen the bright bits with colour select or masking layer without more noise on the dim bits.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29-05-2008, 06:42 PM
monoxide's Avatar
monoxide
Registered User

monoxide is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 658
Thanks Ric and Fred,
you're not wrong about the need for flats, when i pushed the data harder it was a lot more obvious.
at the moment though i'm mainly just trying to work out the camera, the gain and offset settings are going to take a lot of experimenting, at the moment though i think i need to take the offset up just a touch as i'm not getting the finer detail i'd expect from a 10 minute sub even though my processing is sub standard.

i'm going to have another go tonight without the UHC-S as this seems to throw the colour balance a lot, i've also found a way to attach my mpcc but i don't know how accurate the spacing is at the moment, im about to go take a few subs to see if its better or worse.

i probably should have mentioned that the images i posted were SUM combined with NO flats or darks, im very very happy with how smooth the result was considering this.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29-05-2008, 07:09 PM
Gama's Avatar
Gama
Registered User

Gama is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,121
Hi TJ,
Try a spacer of around 30mm (I use the Meade f3.3 reducer spacer), as i use the MPCC and this seems to be the best for me, and also the spacing of the sensor glass to the top of the metal case is around 22mm from memory, so both together gives you the required 52mm or so.

For a first image, its pretty good. But you have learned on the pain and torture of others (Mainly Doug and Clive), so its off to a new world of processing for you to TJ.

Theo.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29-05-2008, 09:41 PM
monoxide's Avatar
monoxide
Registered User

monoxide is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 658
not wrong Theo,
atleast now i know its not my gear holding me back, even though its pretty modest its still pretty capable, i just have to put the effort in to be able to reap the rewards.

on a good note, i think ive solved my coma problems without the need to get an additional spacer, if you take off the small ring it screws into the filter thread on the standard 2" nose piece i have attached, seems to be working well from the subs ive just taken.
just a warning though, the threads are not the same but they are close enough that it will hold without any chance of falling off but if you force it you could damage the threads.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 29-05-2008, 10:27 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
yes, for no darks thats good for 10 min subs, but those pure colour pixels might be hotties, which will go with darks. Theres some vignetting there too.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 30-05-2008, 02:14 AM
monoxide's Avatar
monoxide
Registered User

monoxide is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 658
heres a re-processed high res version too:
still a bad gradient but what can ya do...
the jpg compression has hurt it a lot compared to the tif.

http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/l...eprocessed.jpg
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Lagoon2.jpg)
190.3 KB12 views

Last edited by monoxide; 30-05-2008 at 03:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement