Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-07-2005, 08:25 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Reprocessed - Backyard milkyway on the EQ platform

Hi guys.

Remember the backyard widefield shots I took on the EQ platform on the 3rd July?

Well I got around to reprocessing one of them using "registar" to register and combine the images, instead of registax. It's a much better tool for widefield stacking and the stacked image was a much better result with more pinpoint stars. I also added some mouse-over labels to show the objects.

The image shown below is the preview version, click on the image to go the full version (200k) where you'll see the mouse-overs.



Comments welcome.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-07-2005, 08:57 AM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Mike nice shot dude and yeah I like Registar too !

Louie
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-07-2005, 09:21 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
gee those tres block out alot dont they!!!
nice shot mike!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-07-2005, 12:14 PM
toetoe's Avatar
toetoe (Peter)
Always Trying

toetoe is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Albury, N.S.W.
Posts: 1,296
Nice one Mike I find that mouse over shots are a great help for myself and others who are still trying to put names to the stars above.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-07-2005, 06:14 PM
Orion's Avatar
Orion
Obsessed

Orion is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Swansea N.S.W.
Posts: 1,107
You are getting to be an expert at this Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-07-2005, 07:24 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Just when I thought it was safe to get the kodak DSLR out again!

Good stuff mate.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-07-2005, 11:00 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
I just wonder if 15 second exposures-sufficient numbers stacked- would get anywhere near...(my point and shoot digicam only goes for 15 secs..got to try one of these days.)

Nice processing Mike
Narayan
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-07-2005, 08:09 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Thanks guys.

Quote:
...(my point and shoot digicam only goes for 15 secs..got to try one of these days.)
I'm not sure why you'd want to use your point-and-shoot when you have the canon 300d?

Before I had tracking I used 15s exposures (3 of them, stacked) which is about the limit I could go to before trailing was evident.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement