Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-03-2008, 10:06 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Exclamation M20 (Trifid) and M8 (Lagoon) Nebulas - my best yet

Hi guys

This started out as a quick run at the end of an imaging session while I waited for Jupiter to rise.. I saw M8/M20 was rising, only about 25-30deg at the time but I set up a run and went back to bed for a couple of hours until Jupiter was up higher.

It's only 42mins worth of exposure (7 x 6 minutes), but i'm really happy with how it turned out. I took a lot of time in processing this image, with a lot of selective processing, selective high pass filtering, selective levels and curves, etc. I feel like i'm finally starting to get the hang of this DSO stuff.

I used Jase's beautiful image to guide me to know when I'd done enough processing

Unmodded Canon 350D + ED80 + WO 0.8x reducer. Guided with PHD + DMK. Darks with ICNR, flats calibrated in ImagesPlus.
Unfortunately the WO was not square or something, so there's horrible elongated stars in the corners.

Attached is a small version, but it's best to look at the 1200px wide less compressed version:

M20 (Trifid) and M8 (Lagoon) Nebulas (Click the image to see the full size).

I really can't wait to give this another go at SPSP, when it's rising higher, under very dark skies, and I can give it loads more exposure time.

Thanks for looking.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (20080314-m8m20-800px.jpg)
197.7 KB105 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-03-2008, 10:13 PM
citivolus's Avatar
citivolus (Ric)
Refracted

citivolus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carindale
Posts: 1,178
To me the gamma looks a bit high and black seems to be a tad high up the histogram, but then I'm using an uncalibrated laptop at the moment.

If I were composing the shot, I think I would take the objects up just a bit in the frame. Left to right is good, as you don't want to lose the cluster. You seem to be using a good field size/focal length for this pair.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-03-2008, 10:56 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
You've gotta be happy with that for an unatended image run, very nice

I am too chicken to leave my NJP and AP alone while I sleep..I must be paranoid? I do go inside and surf the net but I have to check on things every 20min or so, even if just to check my subs for any errors that might mean I have to take another in its place..?.... Seriously though without an accurately trained temp compensating focuser I get focus shift and I like to refocus every 30min, I think this ensures the highest quality focus throughout an imaging run.

The other night I must say I did 5 hrs of imaging on one object and the average dy/dx guide errors were around 0.15pix or +/- 0.3" the whole time!!...still checked on it and refocused every 30min or so though

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-03-2008, 02:29 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
great shot mikey. you must be happy with it. using the w.o focal reducer gave you such a widefield with the ed80? is it free of coma or did you cropped abit around the edges?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-03-2008, 08:18 AM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
Hi guys

Unfortunately the WO was not square or something, so there's horrible elongated stars in the corners.
I had the same problem when I used the WO field flattener with my ZS110. You get a nice wide field, but have to do a whole lot of work to round up the stars.

Nice pic to get these two together.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-03-2008, 10:54 AM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
very very pleasing.

WOW
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-03-2008, 11:42 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
so where is the planet? LOL nice work Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-03-2008, 12:41 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Lovely capture Mike, I always enjoy widefields of this area, they always make for a spectacular image.

Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-03-2008, 02:56 PM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
The large version looks beautiful!
great work from LP`ed Newcastle
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-03-2008, 02:58 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
excellent work there Mike. I will give it a go in a month or 2 when its higher, the east is right over inner Newcastle and heavily light polluted
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-03-2008, 05:51 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
Nice mike, you are coming along well with the deep sky stuff, you must be happy with that one.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-03-2008, 07:10 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Lovely Mike. Composition and processing look spot on. Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19-03-2008, 08:21 PM
Rodstar's Avatar
Rodstar (Rod)
The Glenfallus

Rodstar is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,702
Now that is why the M8/20 area of the sky is my favourite out of the entire heavens!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 19-03-2008, 09:54 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by citivolus View Post
If I were composing the shot, I think I would take the objects up just a bit in the frame. Left to right is good, as you don't want to lose the cluster. You seem to be using a good field size/focal length for this pair.
Thanks Eric, I agree about the composition. However due to the flattener not flattening, I had to be careful not to get the cluster near the corners.

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
You've gotta be happy with that for an unatended image run, very nice

I am too chicken to leave my NJP and AP alone while I sleep..I must be paranoid? I do go inside and surf the net but I have to check on things every 20min or so, even if just to check my subs for any errors that might mean I have to take another in its place..?.... Seriously though without an accurately trained temp compensating focuser I get focus shift and I like to refocus every 30min, I think this ensures the highest quality focus throughout an imaging run.

The other night I must say I did 5 hrs of imaging on one object and the average dy/dx guide errors were around 0.15pix or +/- 0.3" the whole time!!...still checked on it and refocused every 30min or so though

Mike
Thanks Mike - I was like that to start with, but now I have to trust that it's doing the job properly. Once or twice I've woken up and come out to PHD guiding beeping at me because of a lost guide star due to clouds. But sleep was necessary after all those clear nights we had! Unattended imaging is perfect when it all goes right!

Quote:
Originally Posted by EzyStyles View Post
great shot mikey. you must be happy with it. using the w.o focal reducer gave you such a widefield with the ed80? is it free of coma or did you cropped abit around the edges?
Thanks Eric, I'm very happy with it. Your DSLR shots are amazing motivation and set a very high standard to aspire to.
The W.O reducer/flattener gives me a focal length of 480mm (f/6) instead of the native 600mm. It's slightly cropped around the edges, but only to account for the slight rotation in each frame after stacking.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghsmith45 View Post
I had the same problem when I used the WO field flattener with my ZS110. You get a nice wide field, but have to do a whole lot of work to round up the stars.

Nice pic to get these two together.
Geoff
Thanks Geoff - the W.O can be very annoying. The first few times I used it I never had the seagull stars in the corners, now I get them often. I need to experiment more with placement, tightening of screws etc, to find the combination where it actually does flatten the field.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
Lovely Mike. Composition and processing look spot on. Well done.
Many thanks Jase - and thanks for your brilliant image to use as inspiration and guidance while processing. I was trying to get more pink/red in the middle of the lagoon but I was wondering whether the lack of H-A in my captures was the cause - or just lack of exposures.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33 View Post
excellent work there Mike. I will give it a go in a month or 2 when its higher, the east is right over inner Newcastle and heavily light polluted
Scott
Thanks Scott, much appreciated. I'm really looking forward to giving it another go when it's up higher. I just couldn't resist it when I was looking for targets at 3am, to take me up to 5am when Jupiter was high enough

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy View Post
Nice mike, you are coming along well with the deep sky stuff, you must be happy with that one.
Thanks Alchemy, I am very happy with it. I feel like I actually know what i'm doing in processing now, instead of just adjusting levels and curves and hoping for the best

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garyh View Post
The large version looks beautiful!
great work from LP`ed Newcastle
Thanks Gary. I'm actually south of Newcastle by about an hour. My east sky isn't too bad luckily. I've got Newcastle to the North, Gosford to the SouthWest and Sydney to the South so neither of those are great.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric View Post
Lovely capture Mike, I always enjoy widefields of this area, they always make for a spectacular image.

Well done.
Thanks Ric - I was very pleased when I took the first test shot for composition and saw that they fit in the field.

Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
so where is the planet? LOL nice work Mike
It came later, I posted it in a separate thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodstar View Post
Now that is why the M8/20 area of the sky is my favourite out of the entire heavens!
You're not wrong, Rod. So much going on. That whole area is new to me for deep-space imaging, so it's going to be like a kid in a candy store picking and choosing targets when it rises a bit higher.


Thanks for all your comments, much appreciated.

I've still got an Omega Centauri and NGC6231/surrounds to process.. hopefully soon!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 19-03-2008, 10:05 PM
Phil's Avatar
Phil
Phil H

Phil is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cowra NSW
Posts: 1,497
Wow Mike thats a grart shot.
Phil
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement