Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-03-2008, 12:34 AM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,837
M44 from Glebe

Hi Guys,

Maybe the focus on this one is a bit better? I only managed one shot before the trees intervened.

1 by 240s + darks
SBIG 2000 XCM, TV85

Thanks for looking

Paul
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (m44_240_filtered_web.jpg)
181.7 KB50 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-03-2008, 10:46 AM
lineout
Registered User

lineout is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 193
Great photo from your location. I'm over at Wollstonecraft so I know the battle you must have with light pollution.

How'd you get such good focusing?

Cheers

Rene
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-03-2008, 11:40 PM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by lineout View Post
Great photo from your location. I'm over at Wollstonecraft so I know the battle you must have with light pollution.

How'd you get such good focusing?

Cheers

Rene
Thanks Rene,

My focusing remark was more of a question. I just got a ST2000 XCM and was having trouble focussing it. I posted some very poorly focussed ones and thought this may be better coz the dim stars are smaller. So I was hoping someone would compare...

Anyway, it is a battle but i find i can go for 3 to 5 minutes per sub from Glebe. Any longer and I use a Astronomic UHC filter.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-03-2008, 12:15 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
keep it up Paul. the ST2000XCM has great potential. You need to clean your sensor though as there are a few blackholes on the right hand side
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-03-2008, 06:28 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Paul,
while I agree with Eric, forget the "imperfections" right now, and get the hang of crawling, before being expected to walk.
Focus is difficult to ascertain in an image, well I find it difficult anyway, unless there is sometime to benchmark it on. Lets say you have it pretty good here.
Now go shoot something like a galaxy, try the 4945, or something you can see. Do all the focusing bits again, and see what the star sizes look like with the galaxy in the shot.
If 5 minutes is all you can get, then do 5 minute subs, just do lots of them. Try some with and some without the light pollution filter too, but be aware that the filter may alter the focus.
Stack them and come back to us. A dozen 5 minute subs should be a good start. If you get a cloudy night, tinker with a library of darks and bias frames. Just settle in your head a temperature set point, I use -20º C, but it could be anything up or down from this. Settle on this and shoot some darks, at the same temp, and at the same exposure duration you figure you will be using. In your case shoot a dozen perhaps at 5 minutes, and another at say 3 minutes. Bias are simple, they are as short as the camera will allow. Store them in a folder, Bias in a sub-folder, darks in another. Then the only variable is the flats, and unless you have a semi-permanent setup (focuser/camera/focus point/scope) you need to do these at the time you image. Try one next time you image though, as this should alleviate the snags Eric is talking about.
Lots to do, but look on the bright side, if you didn't have a one shot colour camera you would need all this at least three times, LOL.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-03-2008, 03:53 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Paul,
Choose a star around the 4-7mag and draw a box around it to instruct the software to only download sub frames. Then monitor the FWHM or intensity values of the star as you tweak the focuser dial. Don't choose a star too bright as this will cause major fluctuations in the readings. Can't recall the specifics of how this is done in CCDSoft, but I used to do it in MaximDL before I went auto i.e. FocusMax and RoboFocus. Now I don't think about focusing, as all the mundane work is done automatically and I can assured I'm always within the CFZ. Need more subs too. You're getting there. CCD work is very different to DSLR.

Look forward to seeing more.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement