Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 21-02-2008, 03:46 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
M42 and Eta Carina, from BrisVegas

I used my integrating video camera (Watec 120N+) to take 10 sec shots of M42 and the Eta Carina Nebula just to see if it could peer through the light pollution of Brisbane and how good this camera is as an imager. Took 50x10 sec shots, dark corrected and stacked in Deepskystacker. Levels in PS.
I was surprised as there was less hassle taking the shots apart from clouds etc. Pleased to know I have a camera capable of 1/2000sec to 1min-10 min integrated shots, so I will see what its capable of doing with the planets.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M42.jpg)
25.1 KB41 views
Click for full-size image (Tarantula.jpg)
50.3 KB42 views

Last edited by allan gould; 21-02-2008 at 04:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-02-2008, 05:29 PM
5ash's Avatar
5ash (Philip)
Earthling

5ash is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hunter valley. nsw
Posts: 1,117
Hi allan ,
Looks like your off to a good start.I've been using the g star ex and find that for nebula you need to take at least 200 frames to get a sharp noise free image. I know the watec is less noisy than the g star but i think you'll find that you'll get better pics.I have attached an m42 lrgb i took with the g star on my 8" lx90. It was 650 L , 200 R, 200 G and 200B stacked in DSS and adjusted in PS7.In each case the master dark was also the same number of frames as the light frames.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M42LRGBmedian final2.jpg)
69.1 KB27 views

Last edited by 5ash; 21-02-2008 at 05:30 PM. Reason: spell
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-02-2008, 05:53 PM
Tamtarn's Avatar
Tamtarn
Barb and David

Tamtarn is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
Good effort Alan. Looks promising for planetary.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-02-2008, 09:08 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Watec 120n+

Yes with these type of cameras its true that more is better. I use the Watec 120N+ purely as a guiding camera but was interested to see how it would image so I bought a USB capture device for $30 and connected to it with vertuldub (Excellent program). The only thing I dont like is all the *^%(*^ wires every where.
Anyway thanks for the kind comments. Ive found that the dynamic range of these cameras is very high as shown by fits liberator.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ash View Post
Hi allan ,
Looks like your off to a good start.I've been using the g star ex and find that for nebula you need to take at least 200 frames to get a sharp noise free image. I know the watec is less noisy than the g star but i think you'll find that you'll get better pics.I have attached an m42 lrgb i took with the g star on my 8" lx90. It was 650 L , 200 R, 200 G and 200B stacked in DSS and adjusted in PS7.In each case the master dark was also the same number of frames as the light frames.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-02-2008, 10:38 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
top shot allan. for 10sec subs, that camera captured quite alot of photons!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement