Quote:
Originally Posted by sheeny
Very nice Jase! I like the composition - looking at the star.
Al.
|
Thanks Al.

I did pay particular focus on the composition as I wanted to show what was causing the reflection. The version displayed is cropped. There is actually a little more space around the edges of the full frame which I'll use for prints etc. Composition was tight however and took quite some time to frame correctly (approx 30min or so). When I finally kicked of the imaging run, the auto guider wasn't tracking correctly, then I realised that because I rotated the FOV I need to recalibrate - Doh! It’s the simple things in the middle of the night that get you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar
Magnificent... Love your work!!!
|
Cheers Doug, pleased you liked it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon
Jase That is some awesome image, were do you get all this celeverness from. (is there such a word)  i love it.
Leon 
|
Thanks Leon.

I'm assuming you mean cleverness (or you've just invented a new profanity for the Websters dictionary)

. Nothing special let me tell you. I simply do all my planning (target, location, composition, exposure times, framing, guide star selection, etc) well before I’m at the telescope. From the plans, I create scripts which I upload to the telescope – the rest is pretty much automated. Seriously though, never over look composition. If you’re looking to step up your imaging, take the time to frame the object with some thought – make it interesting and give depth. The FSQ you’ve got is a great instrument for object pairings. Try fitting a few objects in the FOV or perform a mosaic to get the result your after. You’re only limited by your imagination.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick pinner
that is a stunning image Jase love it.
|
Thanks Mick. Appreciate the kind words.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theodog
Very nice image Jase. Would any more processing give value for time spent? -I think not. All that is required in an image is there in spades. 
|
Cheers Jeff.

I would have to agree that there comes a point where the quantity of processing delivers almost diminishing returns. Depending on the quality of the data, you’ll either spend more or less time processing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenc
Thanks Jase, another masterpiece.
|
Thanks Glen. I’m getting around to your imaging request. Stay tuned…
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty P
Outstanding image Jase, a true work of art.
|
Cheers Matty P.

Thanks for checking it out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rigel003
Fantastic image with so much detail in the nebula. Beautiful composition too with the way you've framed it with Rigel.
|
Thanks Graeme.

Was certainly a tight fit in the FSQ/STL11k frame (155.8 x 233.7 arcmin).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy
i read the other replys first before checking out the image .... what can i say... ditto.
really nice jase , a quality start to the year.
|
Cheers Alchemy.

Interesting way of viewing a post – look at others peoples comments first before viewing the image. I typically first look for the instrument and camera used (if posted), then check out the image before making a comment. Thanks again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter_4059
Great image - love the way it appears to be looking at the star.
|
Thanks Peter. Appreciate it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by browndog
Agree with all of the comments so far. Really great image.
The detail in the nebula is fantastic, it really does look like a witch...
|
Cheers Ian.

It is an interesting and challenging imaging target that for sure.
=======
Thanks all for taking the time to check out the image and make comment.