Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-12-2007, 03:10 PM
PeteMo (Pete)
Bagdad astro nut

PeteMo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chelmsford, UK
Posts: 156
Rigel QuickFinder v Telrad

I've got a Skywatcher 10" dob f1200 and I'm not into the upside down inside out view through the 8 x 50 finder scope that came with the scope.

I therefore want to replace the 8 x 50 finder with either the Rigel quickFinder or the Telrad. I have also used red dot finders in the past a liked the way I could just plonk the red dot on the star or planet I wanted to view. but liked the way the Rigel/Telrad make use of concentric circles to mark 1/2 degree, degree etc and offeres a larger aperture than typical red dot finders.

As the Telrad sight is located some way back from the front of the tube compared with the Rigel, I'm leaning more towards the Rigel.

Does anyone have experience using either of these on a shortish 10" dob?

Cheers
Pete
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2007, 04:16 PM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
I use a Telrad on an 8", its mounted beside the focuser with the RACI finder mounted a bit back so I can use it without fogging the Telrad with my breath.

Works well and there are plenty of Telrad finder charts on the web.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2007, 05:02 PM
goober's Avatar
goober (Doug)
No obs, raising Harrison

goober is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 796
When I was into Dobs I was a Telrad man. Loved the half, 2, 4 degree circles, and the fact a lot of atlases supported them.

I've got a 1x finder on my refractor now, which combined with a 3 degree FOV eyepiece, gets me where I want to go.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2007, 05:45 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,531
I really like the Telrad (but have not used the Rigel).

I have one on my 8 inch dob mounted reflector and also on my 12.5 inch dob reflector. I really found it uncomfortable to use the original finder scopes and so simply use the Telrad now.

I find the "bullseye" natural to use and would be lost without it.

I have recently mounted a red dot finder as a replacement for the small finder on my ED80 refractor...but have not had much chance to use it yet so I can not comment.

Clear Skies!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2007, 06:14 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
I have both and for me they were simply a pointing device ie I havent made use of the degree reticules for navigating with star charts.

The main difference is in the size and weight. The smaller rigel comes with two mounting feet designed to fit different diameter OTA tubes and can easily serve double duty if you own a refractor as well. You wouldn't put a telrad on a small scope like a refractor.
The Rigel works just fine on my 10" dob
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2007, 09:33 AM
JethroB76's Avatar
JethroB76 (Jeff)
Registered User

JethroB76 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tassie
Posts: 1,104
Agree, the rigel works well, has a small footprint and is very light. The telrad is also a beauty but takes up more room and brings a little more weight.
Either in conjunction with a RACI is great on a Dob IMO
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2007, 05:30 PM
Sentinel's Avatar
Sentinel
Registered User

Sentinel is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Auckland
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isdonisgood View Post
Agree, the rigel works well, has a small footprint and is very light. The telrad is also a beauty but takes up more room and brings a little more weight.
Either in conjunction with a RACI is great on a Dob IMO
I have had scopes a used both a Telrad and a Quikfinder.

The Quikfinder is far better. It weighs significantly less and ergonomically is easier to use as it sits further off the scope, which also helpful with dew.

The Quikfinder has a built in pulse mechanism.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-2007, 08:40 PM
JethroB76's Avatar
JethroB76 (Jeff)
Registered User

JethroB76 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tassie
Posts: 1,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentinel View Post

The Quikfinder has a built in pulse mechanism.
Good point.
I forgot that (probably because its been so long since I have used it ), its a great feature that can be built into the Telrad but comes standard in the Rigel.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement