Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-11-2007, 09:36 AM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Another first autoguided pic - Horsehead

Hi all
Finally have my side/side setup running! PHD is one awesome piece of software.... Anyway - with clear skies, and the horsehead starting to clear some local light pollution, I thought what better target.

The pic is 1 hour (20x3min) of luminance exposure - DSI Pro II, ED80 at f/7.5, Astronomik UV/IR block filter. Dark subtracted and flat frame adjusted with deep sky stacker, exposures performed with Nebulosity. Guided through Skywatcher 100mm f/5 achromat, DMK21AF04.AS and PHD guiding. Outback cooler running, temp 20.0degC

I'm quite happy with it - guiding was excellent (and easy!), stars round, happy with focus (thanks to WO focuser) - but there are some black streaks - these only show up in the final histogram stretching stages. In the past I have had these much worse, and it was put down to dark frame temp-mismatch - with the Outback I thought this would vanish - maybe it has just reduced it a heap..... Any other ideas? I feel that more, longer exposures would increase signal-to-noise ratio, and avoid some need to stretch so much....

I would have done longer exposures, but I only had some pre-done 3 minute master darks!

Certainly a big improvement on my last years horsey.....
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (HH2-sm.jpg)
181.6 KB96 views

Last edited by Lee; 18-11-2007 at 03:47 PM. Reason: line break
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-11-2007, 10:50 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
I would still guess at the darks Lee. If you can, shoot the darks as you shoot the lights, if you know what I mean. I am lazy and have a selection of "library darks", but really the only way is to shoot them each night. With the 30 minute shots I use the library ones, but for something like 5 minutes or even 10 minutes I would shoot them every time. Try it and see.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-11-2007, 08:37 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Lee,
Indeed, a significant improvement to last years image. It looks like the you've tried to stretch the data too hard, thus introduced excessive noise. Possibly a darks issue. Look forward to seeing more.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-11-2007, 08:54 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,428
Nice go at it Lee, glad to see my borrowed stuff is working for you
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-11-2007, 08:24 AM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
Well done Lee! other than whats already mentioned you have the focus and guiding spot on! Look forwards to the next shot!
cheers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-11-2007, 08:59 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Nice capture Lee. The guiding looks great.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-11-2007, 09:18 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,820
Hi Lee

That is a terrific HH – nice round stars and sharp focus, well done.

It looks like the lines of the (few) hot and cold pixels seem to generally follow the same direction as the “noise” streaks. This makes it look like something is shifting between sub-frames?

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-11-2007, 11:48 AM
Aster's Avatar
Aster
Registered User

Aster is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Healesville, Vic. Australia
Posts: 177
Nice one Lee. It's nice to see some other DSI Pro images instead of all the Canon ones.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-11-2007, 10:40 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis View Post
It looks like the lines of the (few) hot and cold pixels seem to generally follow the same direction as the “noise” streaks. This makes it look like something is shifting between sub-frames?
I've wondered this - but why only shift between exposures - the stars are all round, so I assume nothing is shifting during an exposure..... I think it is overstretched.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Aster View Post
Nice one Lee. It's nice to see some other DSI Pro images instead of all the Canon ones.
Thanks Alex..... Going to point my Ha filter at him soon, took some 10 minute darks tonight.....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-11-2007, 06:18 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,820
Hi Lee

A similar thing happened to me a long time ago, when I was using an SBIG proprietary function labelled “Track & Accumulate” with the SBIG cameras/software.

The SW, on the fly, stacks each sub-frame even though the mount is not auto guiding and the end result is that you obtain a combined image of say, 20 x 90 sec but it is not full frame. The image area is defined by the common area of overlap of all the sub frames and the non common regions outside the overlapped area (caused by drift) are discarded.

It was under such conditions I had similar streaks to you, as each sub-frame was shifted relative to its successor due to (small) tracking drift. This is probably a complete red herring though, as you were auto guiding?

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 22-11-2007, 05:30 PM
stlfiremedic35's Avatar
stlfiremedic35
Registered User

stlfiremedic35 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Saint Louis Missouri
Posts: 5
There is a guy that sells a photoshop plugin called astronomy tools actions. One of the things it does is remove vertical line noise the example he used looks just like the lines in the horse head picture. Over all a pretty good picture, more shots stacked may of helped, I am just going by what i have read, I dont have the hands on know how most of you guys do, not yet anyway. I have been useing data that was given to me by other people and practicing processing it with photoshop and ps tools. latter when I get a camera Ill work on that part of it. Wow photoshop is a tuff program to learn without a teacher. Hey have fun thats what its all about, Ken
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement