Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-06-2005, 10:21 PM
Rohan's Avatar
Rohan
Registered User

Rohan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 100
What are the FOV parameters of an LX90

Hi,

I've been using Starry Night Pro 5 recently and it has the option to input eyepieces and scope details which it can then project over the sky maps to show the user what they should be seeing through any given eyepiece (see attached image).

So what i want to do is have one for my LX90 with no eyepieces so i can get an idea of what the FOV will be when i have a SLR attached at prime focus. Anyone know what parameters it may be. I have options to enter "type of eyepiece' ie. plossl, 'eyepice diameter' and the 'aperature field of view'. The default aperature field of view is 50deg. I have used this when entering my bintel plossl eyepieces. Should this be another figure?

Cheers in advance and i highly recommend the program for telescope control and such.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (starry_night_5.jpg)
71.4 KB16 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-06-2005, 10:31 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
here ya go Rohan. From "Astrophotography for the Amateur"

This is for 35 mm film, so there is probable a 1.5X adjustment for canon ccd
Focal length to field of view
400mm = 3.4 degX 5.2 deg
500mm = 2.7 X 4.1
600mm = 2.3 X 3.4
800mm = 1.7 X 2.6
1000mm = 1.4 X 2.1
1250mm = 1.1 X 1.7
1500mm = 0.9 X 1.4
2000mm = 41' X 62'
5200mm = 33' X 50'
3000mm = 28' X 41'
4000mm = 21' X 31'
5000mm = 17' X 25'
6000mm = 14' X 21'
8000mm = 10' X 15'
15000mm = 5.5' X 8.3'
20000mm = 4.1' X 6.2'

Now from what I understand if your using the canon then you need to multiply your FL by 1.5 to bring it inline with 35 mm film. This may mean you need to divide the fields of view to bring them into comparison. I'm sure someone else here would be able to make that clearer
Cheers

ps there is a formula for working it out if you have a different focal length, but its only withing 1% accuracy if your FL is over 1000mm
Field of View = 57.3 x (w/F) degrees, where w is the width or length of your film and f is the focal length of your scope. Again from "Astrophotography for the Amateur"

Last edited by [1ponders]; 13-06-2005 at 10:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-06-2005, 11:02 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,425
are you using a focal reducer as well? that should widen things out a little
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-06-2005, 10:55 AM
Rohan's Avatar
Rohan
Registered User

Rohan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 100
well havn't actually got the camera yet. Just starting to experiment with the software to what i'll be able to capture.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-06-2005, 11:29 AM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
What Paul says makes sense because the cmos sensor on the EOS is smaller than 35mm film the corresponding FOV will be smaller so you shoud divide the fov by 1.6 Have you got an adapter and T ring yet Rohan if not Scopestuff in the US have a shorty adapter which fits the canon perfectly, allowing full clearance from the forks (although not with a focal reducer)??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-06-2005, 12:16 PM
Rohan's Avatar
Rohan
Registered User

Rohan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 100
Cheers Phil, will keep that in mind when i purchase. at this stage prob going to be a tax return buy (if i get anything half decent)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-06-2005, 12:28 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Rohan if you can find out the dimensions of the cmos chip you can insert each one into the above formula (w) to get a more accurate field of view for the chip
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-06-2005, 01:15 PM
Rohan's Avatar
Rohan
Registered User

Rohan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 100
22.2 X 14.8mm according to a canon brochure i have.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-06-2005, 05:24 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Basic trigonometry:
artan(ccd width/focal length)

0.63 x 0.42 degrees is what I come up with.

Last edited by Starkler; 14-06-2005 at 05:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement