Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-08-2007, 12:33 AM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Astrophotography mount for ED80

hi all,
i'm looking to upgrade from the GS/EQ3 mount I've been using to something a bit more suited to imaging + a few more bells and whistles.
I would love GoTo and an auto guider port but also am aware of stability issues too.
I've cut my search down to (pricewise) celestron CG5-GT mount or a HEQ-5 non-GoTo version.
I intend to initially only use an ED80 on this mount but eventually want to mount a side by side system (small apo refractor or large 300mm lens) so weight isn't a major concern but guiding is!
Question is will any of these mounts cut it for astrophotography???
Cheers
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-08-2007, 09:47 AM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
well, as long you temper your expectations, the CG5 can most certainly be used for astrophotography

here's one of the best imagers that I know of who uses this mount:

http://www.saratogaskies.com/

(though Jim seems to have acquired a Tak last week, most of his work is with the CG5- and an ED80 or an 8 inch newt)

and here are my own efforts-not quite in the same league:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/91784720@N00/
Narayan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-08-2007, 10:54 AM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
Hi Doug, I had the Eq5 mount before which is similar to the CG5 mount and I must admit it should handle the ed80 with a guidescope etc but you will have to tinker with it to get the best from it! Like re-grease the bearings lap the gears etc.
I would go for the Heq5. Being a heavier mount it would handle the load much better and hence would be less of a headache in guiding.
The Heq5 would need similar teaks too I suspect to get it real smooth.
my 2c worth.
cheers Gary
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-08-2007, 11:24 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Are you really sure you need goto Doug? The ED80 has a pretty big field of view for finding things. I rarely use the Argo Navis with the G11 for getting objects centered in the 80, and the GM8 doesn't have goto at all. It means you will need to learn your way around the sky a bit better, but after using an EQ3 you should be pretty good at that anyway

If you opted out of goto for the time being then the EQ6 would be in your range. That would open up a whole new world of potential scope/s ( ) for the future. Plus you could always add goto later on.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-08-2007, 04:54 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by '[1ponders
If you opted out of goto for the time being then the EQ6 would be in your range. That would open up a whole new world of potential scope/s ( ) for the future. Plus you could always add goto later on.
Or a used GM8 perhaps.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-08-2007, 10:45 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
Choices everywhere, but if youre serious one day you will want a bigger andbetter mount, heres the theory i worked on.... great mount and ordinary scope takes pretty good pictures and the ed80 is apo, small amount of distortion at edges all in all good value.
But a good scope with a less than adequate mount will leave you frustrated.
Ifyou want to do GOOD astrophotography, and dont we all, then save and buy the best yu can with room for future bigger scopes
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-08-2007, 09:17 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Thanks for all the comments and advice.
I think after doing a bit more research that the HEQ5 as a minimum is my best option.
Thanks all
Doug
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement