Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-05-2005, 09:38 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
A couple of luna, 19th May 2005

Hey guys.

Watching the moon swim and change shape in bad seeing is quite interesting.. except when you want nice crisp views and nice crisp images.

Here's a couple of luna shots in very ordinary seeing..

Details:
Scope: 10" dob without tracking
Seeing: 3.5/10
Transparency: 6.5/10
Capture: ToUcam 10fps, 1/50s, 0 gain, 0 gamma, 95% saturation
FL: ~3100mm, using 2.4x barlow pulled out and ToUcam pulled out
Processing: 1-2 frames stacked, photoshop filters and contrast/levels adjust

Pretty disappointed with them because they're just not as sharp as I'd like, but the seeing was just too bad..

Clavius - This is a single frame as there were no sharp frames to stack.




Mercator, Campanus and Kies - This is a stack of a couple of frames. Check this region in AS&T page 58.. obviously my image is not high enough resolution or sharp enough to really compare to the magazine shot, but anyway..



Thanks for looking.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-05-2005, 11:04 AM
vindictive666's Avatar
vindictive666 (John)
KeyboardNotFndPressAnyKey

vindictive666 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: geraldton western australia
Posts: 1,184
still looks good to me mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-05-2005, 11:16 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
We tend to forget about the moon sometimes and that it can be just as difficult, if not more difficult a target to get a good shot of, as anything else. There's just not enough black to hid those noisey, turbulent bits.

Good onya Mike. For the seeing you had there's nothing wrong with those shots. Its amazing how discriminatory in our images we are becoming these days with the advances in astronomical hardware technology and processing platforms. They would have probably be considered excellent shots only 20-30 years ago.

JFMI was there a barlow involved?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-05-2005, 11:17 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Thanks guys.. Paul, read more carefully
Quote:
FL: ~3100mm, using 2.4x barlow pulled out and ToUcam pulled out
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-05-2005, 12:23 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Too busy looking at the pictures Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-05-2005, 01:08 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
looks pretty good to me..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-05-2005, 01:38 PM
robin's Avatar
robin
Brave Sir Robin

robin is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Warrnambool,Victoria
Posts: 489
That 1st shot is simply stunning Mike. Almost feel like I'm flying over it in a lunar orbiter & looking out the window.Great stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-05-2005, 02:38 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Thanks for the comments guys.. hopefully i'll have some better ones to post in the next few days - got some more shots last night and the seeing was 200% improved.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement