Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-08-2011, 11:06 PM
ENVY (Peter)
Registered User

ENVY is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Adelaide Australia
Posts: 20
17 or 21 Ethos

I have a 12"lightbridge and am off to a dark site in the Flinders Ranges in a few weeks.
I have been saving and would like to get a new eyepiece (ethos) for the trip.
Help required as am not sure which would suit this scope.
I have a 35mm pan,20mm nagler 9mm nagler and a14mm radian,and 26mm
Meade qx.
Suggestions/help please
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-08-2011, 09:01 AM
sasup's Avatar
sasup (Stacey)
Quick look up

sasup is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: avalon beach sydney
Posts: 455
I run a 17mm ethos on my 12" and its very nice. I also have the 9mm 13mm and 20mm Naglers; also nice. I never use my 24mm pan or my 32mm but its great to have a mix. My advice buy what you can afford, they wont go amiss.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-08-2011, 09:12 AM
Satchmo's Avatar
Satchmo
Registered User

Satchmo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,883
Peter - I would recommend a 17mm Ethos as a better all - rounder than a 21mm giving a little more detail and background sky darkness and still quite a rich 3.5mm exit pupil .
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-2011, 01:11 PM
jeff65 (Jeff)
Registered User

jeff65 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 85
I would give consideration to the 13mm Ethos. The 17mm would likely make your 20mm Nagler redundant while the 13mm would make your 14mm Radian redundant. The 13mm is closer to the sweet spot of a 2mm exit pupil in that scope.

I just did the same sort of research for my 10 inch f/4.7 scope and purchased the 10mm Ethos. I haven't yet had a chance for first light with the combo so I can't comment on the result.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-08-2011, 07:41 PM
sasup's Avatar
sasup (Stacey)
Quick look up

sasup is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: avalon beach sydney
Posts: 455
Not sure I agree that the 13mm is a better chose then the 17mm as a all a rounder but it is a fine bit of gear and next on my list. I was told that with a f5 9mm to 32mm is the range and 17 ethos is mid field. Only what I have been told..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-08-2011, 04:39 PM
jamespierce (James)
Registered User

jamespierce is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 321
Owning a mix of Ethos, Nagler and Panoptic EPs myself (including the 35mm Pan and 20mm Nag) I'm not sure I'd spend the small fortune an Ethos cost when you already have the 20mm Nag... It's tiny and great to look through. The Ethos will be massive and significantly change the balance on your DOB.

We have a 21mm Ethos and a 20mm Nag - I far prefer using the 20mm Nag on our dob, we tend to use the Ethos in the refractors.

Perhaps consider a 13mm Nagler to fill our your set nicely ?

Of course I have no idea what other astro extras you have already, but if you don't have a good adjustable chair, a laser for quick collimation (still expect to tweak by eye) and a good dew system (you're going to need this in the flinders) - spend some money on those first. Next buy the three volume 'Night Sky Observers Guide'. Also if you don't have a freezer suit or similar very warm observing gear, that can make a huge difference to enjoyment and how long you stay out looking.

Oh final thought, adding an Argo Navis to my DOB was perhaps the single best thing I've ever spend astro money on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement