Leo, I use a pretty similar approach when setting up to visually observe variables. In my case I have three square pavers with a hole drilled in the centre of each into which the tripod legs sit. Obviously even very rough alignment is good enough for that purpose. However I'm thinking of moving to imaging and I'm wondering whether this 'carry and plonk it down' method is good enough to allow imaging for 1 minute at 200mm focal length without trailing. So I'm interested to know what you mean by 'close enough for my purposes'. It might answer my question. [Obviously the mount will have been aligned quite well once and just be carried in and out of the garage.]
Joe, that's a good idea. I can't use it in my backyard as I'm surrounded by trees, my garage and house and the neighbour's granny flat. I have no horizon but in suburbia it works well in keeping light out of the backyard. Don't get me wrong; the yard is well lit by skyglow

but no direct light most of the time. However it may be useful if I ever the clouds part when there is a comet about.
Martin, one you have the line on the ground how do you align the RA axis along that line? Do you just sight it or is there a less subjective way to make sure they are parallel?
I just did a three-minute proof of concept. I can see the shadow cast by the string of a plumb bob so why not just hang the plumb bob from a tripod? Survey's tripods are made so that a plumb bob can hang exactly below the centre of the tripod, so it can be positioned directly above a benchmark. But if you only want a N-S line that isn't mandatory.