Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-06-2007, 04:09 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,349
Is this right, 350D Question

These are the sequence of images , 200 secs 5 secs between exposures, @ 800...

Anybody help me here as to how to minimise this...

Cheers All

S
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Untitled-Captured-01.jpg)
63.3 KB56 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2007, 04:16 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
G'day Shawn. What is your image processing program?

If you have the Canon plug in for photoshop they will open in photoshop, but normally you would convert them to TIFF or FITS files and work on them in a program like ImagesPlus or similar to do your dark subtraction and flat divisions.

Once you have worked on them then you can save as jpegs and reduce from there.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2007, 04:54 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,349
Sorry Paul , I should have been more specific, These are thumbs of raws befor processing, Im just alarmed at the increase of noise over an expose like this , Is this a function of accried heat in the sensor / camera, I It will dissapear with darks applied, but is this normal for a 350, or is mine crook,,?

Thanks for your reply
S
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:02 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,349
I use Images plus too, BTW at this stage I have not applied flats to anything, Im still learning, the clear cold has just arrived...:>)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2007, 10:07 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
I see what you mean now. If they are the same length of time then you by rights you shouldn't be getting that increase in glow. What earthly items/objects are in the direction your are shooting?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2007, 11:13 AM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,349
Absolutely nothing Paul, pitch black out here aside from the stars, It looks as though the chip is not cooling down at all between exposures, am I taking the lights too quickly, Is there an optimum cool down time, ?.. I mean the last few in the sequence are pretty much useless. Iether there is something wrong with the 350, or gubbins here is overlooking a setting or something equally obvious to someone with clue......



Shawn
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:09 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
What is your normal process of image taking. It cerainly doesn't look normal and length of time between images shouldn't do that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:37 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,349
Hi ya Paul..

The Camera is set at RAW, mirror lock on, noise reduction of off, I use Images plus for my sequences, but Maxim for guiding, CDC for pionting, thru the Ascom hub "POTH" all on Com 1, Ill set a typical run of say 10 @ 800 x 200 secs, 10 sec delay + 5 secs for mirror settle, total 15 secs between...
The Images I posted are the Raws, so are untouched, but if you look at the images it looks like 1 big 2000 second exposure with gaps,,, if you get my drift...

Thanks Paul

Am I missing something
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-06-2007, 12:26 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Could it be the capture software that you are using that is progressively combining the images?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-06-2007, 04:55 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,349
Thanks Andrew I did think initially I had done something stupid with software, but I ser my camera to keep duplicates on the mem card as well as download to Images plus, these ones are straight off the mem card, and are identical to the downloaded ones, this is the first time my camera has behaved like this. Im really bloody confused at the moment.....

Ive been all over the net trying to find something that may help, to no avail...
Ill keep searching....

Cheers Shawn

...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-06-2007, 05:03 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Looks like a camera fault to me. Have you tried shooting raw on daytime (or late evening) subjects. If you do and get similar results, you can at least make the camera shop guy see that there is a problem.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-06-2007, 05:46 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,349
Starting to look like a camera fault to me too Geoff.. Ill try what you suggest ...

Cheers Shawn
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-06-2007, 05:59 PM
JohnG's Avatar
JohnG (John)
Looking Down From Above

JohnG is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cootamundra, NSW
Posts: 1,711
Hi Shawn

Have you tried using a longer delay between shots. I use a 350D and normally shoot well over 200 seconds, but, I have a delay of between 30 - 60 seconds (depending on the outside temp) between shots. My camera dosen't display this behaviour at all.

May I also suggest turning off the LCD screen, you don't need it for astro shots and, placing the rubber viewfinder plug over the viewfinder.

Cheers

JohnG

Last edited by JohnG; 13-06-2007 at 09:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-06-2007, 08:06 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,438
I've just had a look at this thread for the first time and I was going to suggest the same as John. Try increasing your time between shots to give the sensor time to cool. Worth a try...

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 13-06-2007, 01:39 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,349
Thanks Al
Thanks John

I will try these, suggestions.

Cheers

S
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement