Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-09-2023, 07:23 PM
AstroViking's Avatar
AstroViking (Steve)
Registered User

AstroViking is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,243
M20 from suburbia

Hi all,

I won't bore you with a wall of text this time. Sorry oska, I just don't have it in me at the moment. The thought of going back over the litany of problems I hit is enough to depress me...

So, two sessions from my Bortle 6 backyard here in suburbia.

Equipment:
SW72ED @ 420mm / HEQ5-Pro / ASI183MC-Pro / SV165+SV305 / Kstars/Ekos

Session 1:
* Gain: 100
* Offset: 10
* Temperature: 0 degrees C
* Exposure: 30 seconds
* Frames: 170 Lights, 25 Darks, 34 each of Flats and DarkFlats (85 minutes integration in total)
* Filter: None

Session 2:
* Gain: 100
* Offset: 10
* Temperature: 0 degrees C
* Exposure: 120 seconds
* Frames: 60 Lights, 25 Darks, 50 each of Flats and DarkFlats (120 minutes integration in total)
* Filter: L-Enhance

Data then stacked with Sirilic, dragged into Siril for a quick pre-process and star removal via starnet++ before being poked, prodded and generally messed around with in Affinity Photo.

I think I've resolved the gremlins that plagued me, so let's hope the next clear night is not a night of frustration...

Cheers,
V
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M20_2_Sessions.jpg)
187.0 KB126 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-09-2023, 10:13 AM
Doogs38's Avatar
Doogs38 (Alex)
Wingnut

Doogs38 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 438
As a local famous amateur imager (looking at you John-san, ie. Oska) once said “it wouldn’t be art if you didn't suffer for it” Seriously Steve, it’s a great image regardless of the pain to produce it. Both the reflection and emission nebula are well capture and so too is the surrounding gas and dust - the 72ed is a nice scope and I like it’s wide FOV (I have one too). There is some mild CA which I’ve learnt to accept is the norm for a doublet regardless of what glass is used, and I suspect the mild star bloat was from your first session without a filter? I always use at least a UV/IR filter to stop IR-induced star bloat. I just wish UV/IR filters were a little narrower and started around 440-450nm to reduce the bluish CA.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-09-2023, 07:58 PM
AstroViking's Avatar
AstroViking (Steve)
Registered User

AstroViking is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,243
Thanks Alex,

I keep procrastinating about leaving the UV/IR cut filter in the setup, given the small advantage it gives. I think from here on, it can stay in there if I'm not using the L-Enhance.

Cheers,
V.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement