Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-05-2007, 02:16 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
The LX200 problems progress..

The problems with my LX200 progressed last night.

I received my new electronics from BINTEL:
- brand new hand controller
- brand new front panel
- refurbished service kit

I was a little disappointed with the quality of parts for the hand controller and front panel. The hand controller is nice and obviously brand new but the front surface is has bubbled up at one point - cosmetic. The large capacitor on the front panel had snapped off presumably during transport, I soldered this back on.

After putting the whole lot in it all now works.

However I'm not happy with the RA motor, which appears to have some sort of backlash or lag issue. GOTO is very accurate considering the lack of recent polar alignment adjustments and the frequent mounting/dismounting of the scope from the wedge. However when attempting to calibrate the autoguider I found bizzar behaviour in the RA axis. Probably simply backlash but I'm wondering if it wasn't moving West as willingly as it was moving East.

I'm thinking I'm going to take out the RA motor and put my old one back in. It had absolutely no backlash at all and better PE than this one currently has exhibited.

I did achieve focus and snap a trailed image of some spiral galaxy near M104, but that was it before I ended the night needing sleep.

Hopefully replacing the RA motor will return the machine to it's previously high level of accuracy & performance.

I managed to blow 2 fuses last night, both in the cable powering the LX200. I'm still unsure how or why, but have put my old front panel back in and suspect a fault with the new front panel, or a fault with the power supply. If it is a fault with the power supply that could have been the cause of all the problems and not the lightning. I think I will buy a new power supply just in case.

Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-05-2007, 04:41 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
to my knowledge you cannot replace just one motor or both for that matter because they are coded to the motherboard and come as a kit.
this is only relevant to the classic.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-05-2007, 04:50 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,352
The Errors didnt look like this did they...?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Untitled-Captured-01_002.jpg)
36.2 KB33 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-05-2007, 06:21 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick pinner View Post
to my knowledge you cannot replace just one motor or both for that matter because they are coded to the motherboard and come as a kit.
this is only relevant to the classic.
That's interesting. Well, just last week I had a motherboard working with my old motors which was not the original, the only problem there was that RS232 wasn't working - which suggests to me something other than motor problems. Hmm. Such a tangled web they have woven for us, Meade.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn View Post
The Errors didn't look like this did they...?
Hmm, is there an easy way (free software?) to generate such graphs? The closest I have come in the past was logging the CCDSoft guide corrections then putting that CSV log in to MS Excel. That was more work than I bothered with again though. And sort of required autoguider calibration which is what I'm having problems with right now.

Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-05-2007, 10:19 AM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
I had an illuminated eyepiece in for a bit last night checking the backlash etc. No backlash I could detect in RA using the illuminated eyepiece, in fact behaviour seemed quite normal. Quite a bit of backlash in DEC but that I can improve.

So I'm going to need some more diagnosis to work out what was going on with the guide calibrations. Perhaps some flexure or other movement. Unsure.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-05-2007, 04:53 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,352
I find it easier to understand a graphical representation of the error, you can also see what tweaks make a difference, this error had me completely baffled, the slight underlying undulation was my failure to PEC train, the radical jumps from one side of spot on to the other I have not yet remedied, Can you me informed of your trials and tribulations...

PS the graph , is a feature of Maxim DL,s guide function...

Good Luck

Shawn

...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-05-2007, 05:01 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
I plan to do some more testing tonight. I'm aiming to get it guiding to the point where I can then use the guide corrections to form a graph of the error. I'll let you know how I go, but it may take a bit longer than just tonight.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement