Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-05-2007, 09:42 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,426
A non astro community announcement for NSW drivers

To improve the safety of school children, penalties for traffic and parking offences in school zones will increase from 21 May 2007.


The increased fines and demerit points will apply to 130 offences committed in school zones during posted school hours.

New fines and demerit point increases include:

Speeding – minimum fines of $128 and 4 demerit points.

Approach children’s crossing too quickly to stop safely – $384 fine and 4 demerit points.

Double parking – $231 fine and 2 demerit points.

Stopping on or near a children’s crossing – $308 and 2 demerit points.

To check out the full list of school zone demerit points and offences see the RTA website:

http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/rulesregul...tlist_dl1.html

Increased fines and demerit points in school zones are part of a Child Road Safety Package which also includes:

An electronic school speed zone alert system, incorporating flashing 40km/hr signs, installed at 100 school sites.

A combination of 50 fixed and mobile speed cameras.

A Drop off and Pick Up scheme to relieve parking congestion outside schools.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2007, 09:44 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I think that's fair enough.. I've driven through school zones many times and kids can run out of anywhere. You really need to pay attention.

Not to mention I don't want drivers driving fast near my kids school!

I think these extra penalties are a good idea to get people to slow down around schools.

Having said that, the last point is definitely needed at most schools. It's absolute chaos most days with parents picking up and dropping off kids. Some parents add to the danger with their behaviour outside schools.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2007, 09:55 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,426
yes that true, but how can these things be enforced without general duties Police baing on hand to do it. There are no resources to really make this effective
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2007, 10:08 AM
cahullian's Avatar
cahullian
Hapkido = Pain

cahullian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,014
Its the same with all road rules. Unless the police are on hand law breakers will get away with it. But the thought of working a couple of days to pay your fines if caught might make some hoons slow down..but I doubt it. I work in a high school and the number of people I see flying past is terrible. Why not go the whole hog and make it a loss of licence if caught doing over 10km in school zones, that might slow some down.

Gazz
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2007, 10:13 AM
Dujon's Avatar
Dujon
SKE

Dujon is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Blaxland, N.S.W.
Posts: 634
I suppose, Houghy, that the deterrent is that they might be - just like mobile speed cameras.

Any driver who knowingly drives through a school zone and ignores the accepted mores should be flogged. I live close to a primary school and a kindergarten (different premises and not related) and have often baulked because of shadows or movement behind the parked vehicles. I'd rather do that though than clobber an impulsive or careless child.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-2007, 11:54 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
i think its fine, as long as the police arent neglecting the real criminals out there while they are trying to raise revenue...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:00 PM
cahullian's Avatar
cahullian
Hapkido = Pain

cahullian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,014
I agree ving. Far too often police drive past muggings or whatever to stop someone who is driving a little too fast. I also think they like the thought of a good car chase through the city.

Gazz
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:02 PM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
That is all well and good BUT to reduce risk there is a cascade used in the safety industr:
  • eliminate
  • substitute
  • isolate
  • etc
In the mountains we have schools on the Great Western Highway and going down to 40kph, while a noble idea, is not practical or ignored by many drivers.

Why not isolate the school from the highway with a tall metal fence and organise a pickup area off the highway?

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:08 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmcpb View Post
That is all well and good BUT to reduce risk there is a cascade used in the safety industr:
  • eliminate
  • substitute
  • isolate
  • etc
etc?

i dont remember that one in my OH&S training
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:10 PM
cahullian's Avatar
cahullian
Hapkido = Pain

cahullian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 1,014
In a perfect world all school would be located in pedestrian areas thus avoiding any need for such drastic actions. It has happened in lots of inner city shopping areas why not school?

Gazz
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-05-2007, 12:15 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
I think all agree that keeping our school zones safe (and the people inside of them) is a great idea...

If enhanced penalties or enforcement help do this then in my opinion it is a good thing...

Having participated in the school pick-up/drop-off chaos a few times it is clear to me that something more needs to be done.

Be Safe!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-05-2007, 01:17 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Fantastic ideas. Hopefully Qld will follow suit, especially on the double parking one. How about U turns across a double white line just before the pedestrian crossing at the top of a hill. That one needs about $1000 and all your points.

I drive through a crossing every morning at peak dropoff time. There is a high school on one side of the road and a primary school on the other and a special school at the T intersectionat the end, and a billion kids everywhere. This is not a major traffic road though does get a fair amount of through traffic and there is a lollipop guard at the crossing. The police monitor the main road at the T intersection about 300 meters down at least once a week. The tafe is next do and some of the younger boys and girls (and adults) think the nice straight road is just right for a bit more speed than 40 ks.

However speed is not the main issue here. It is the last two, double parking and stopping too near the crossing (how about dropping off at the crossing itself ). I really don't believe that some parents think at times, or there minds certainly aren't on what they are doing at the time. Oh and if you think I am joking about the U turn comment, I would see it at least twice a week. The mornings are by far and away the worst. Hit 'em hard, hit 'em high and hit 'em often. Those infringing will either learn quickly or loose their licenses. If it means protecting our kids then no mercy. Being able to drive on our roads is a privilage, not a right!




Puts soapbox away
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-05-2007, 01:27 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
It is interesting that parliament having a fair share of lawyers sees that a new law is needed to stop something when invariably there are plenty of laws available at that point to deal with the problem.
However with that off my chest I support the effort to at least address the issue.
It is unfortunate that folk are given a licence in the first place that show the irresponsibility that requires penalties.
Driving cars should be seen as much the same as gun handling... the consequences are not far removed if the licence holder is irresponsible and lets ego or pressure of time have them thinking they are above the law and duty of care to other citizens...
However as observed it is one thing to implement laws it is another to ensure funding to make them effective.
More police and less waste on desalinators and misuse of funds on Government "advertizing" I suppose is an unreasonable suggestion.
alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement