Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 16-01-2008, 09:50 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Rosette Neb guided in Siderial

Hi guys the other night i thought i might try my skills on the Rosette Neb, but it was obvious that my skills need honing, so to speak.

Anyway, i forgot to put the G11 in Photo Mode and did 5 images at 6 minutes each in normal tracking mode

However, it seemed to do pretty well, and the end result is an un-cropped wide field of the Rosette Neb.

5 exposures at 6 minutes at 500 ISO, through the Tak, and Canon 5D on G11, processed in Image Plus, with flats, and ICNR, levels and curves in PS2.

Please comment either way, I can handle it

Leon
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (iis.jpg)
159.8 KB79 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-01-2008, 11:24 PM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,837
I think it looks fine Leon. The stars look very nice as well. One thing that i found is that the more data the better the image. I reckon if you added some more data you would be even more pleased with the result

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-01-2008, 12:07 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
hi leon, nothing is wrong with that pic at all. you captured quite alot of h-alpha from an unmodded cam!. no clipping either well done.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-01-2008, 04:48 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Thanks Paul, and Eric, yep i agree a few more frames would have helped, but i ran out of time, anyway I'm pretty happy for a first go at this one.

You see it is all Eric's fault, I had never heard of the Rosette Nebula until he showed his master piece and thought, i must have a try at this one

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-01-2008, 10:15 PM
Tamtarn's Avatar
Tamtarn
Barb and David

Tamtarn is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
That's great Leon. Hope you re visit this one and do lots more exposures. Everything looks good. Guiding, focus ,detail, colour and processing.

Let's see more of this one from you
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-01-2008, 10:54 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Dave, Barb, Thanks for the comments, yes i do intend to spend a bit more time on the Rosette Nebula, when the Moon Racks off and the nights are good.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-01-2008, 09:28 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Hi Leon, your image looks great everything is nice and sharp and the colours look very natural as well. As you have mentioned a bit more data will definitely help in bringing out the finer details.

What is the difference between the photo mode and tracking mode that you mentioned?

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-01-2008, 09:51 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Ric when you are just doing visuals and stuff like that the mount is in siderial mode and that is fine for that sort of viewing, as the object will stay in the FOV for ever if you are polar aligned.

However if i want to do some imaging with auto guiding in PHD,it is best to put the mount into photo mode, which gives you better tracking conditions for imaging.

In normal tracking mode PHD would be chasing the guide star all over the place unless you are pretty well spot on with alignment, and it is quite possible to lose it altogether.

I forgot to do this and left the mount in normal tracking mode, fired up PHD and started guiding in this mode instead of Photo Mode, however it ended up guiding pretty well, so i expect my alignment is nearly close to correct.

Anyway it didn't seem to effect the imaging run to much.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-01-2008, 09:55 AM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
Not bad Leon,
that is a very nice result for 30min of this.
Its not a real easy target especially for a unmodded camera.
Well done!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-01-2008, 10:03 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Thanks Leon

Thats very interesting.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-01-2008, 04:24 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Thanks Gary, next time when i get the chance i will go a bit longer and see how that will improve the shot, and put the mount in the proper mode might help as well.

Leon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement