Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-12-2018, 04:09 PM
Karlzburg (Karl)
No moon for you!!

Karlzburg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Mudgee, NSW
Posts: 330
Eta Carinae

I tried Eta Car again with the reducer off to see what difference it would make. I know the resolution doubles with it off as far as what APT tells me when I do the calcs.

12 x 600sec
ISO 200
Darks
no Bias or flats
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (EtaCarinae.jpg)
219.4 KB70 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-12-2018, 12:48 PM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,005
Hi Karl,

Looking at each of your pics, I woulld say that the focal reducer you are using is introducing astigmatism and spherical aberration. The tell-tale sign of astigmatism is those little seagulls that are co-centric to the optical axis. The spherical aberration comes from the comet-like appearance of the stars - it's not coma here. Coma has a similar appearance, but it's not what is being seen.

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-12-2018, 08:58 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
However a great effort Karl given the quipment issues.
Alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement