Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-09-2018, 09:39 PM
boz_m (Alexander)
Registered User

boz_m is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 19
PHD Guiding Tips

Hi all,

I have been recently trying to get my guiding better. I have a Celestron 8" EdgeHD + 0.7x reducer and an AVX mount.

This is my startup routine:
- Run the AVX two star align + 4 calib stars
- Run the AVX polar align
- Open PHD2 and run the calibration routine
- Run the PHD2 drift align (but the AVX polar align did the trick this time)
- Run the PHD2 guiding assistant to work out the best settings

This is the first time i have done this and my guiding improved a lot. I was consistently under 1 RMS error.

3 questions:
- The first picture is my backlash graph from the Guiding Assistant routine. Does this look right?
- The first guiding graph is around the zenith. When i was doing this i was getting 6 min exposures with no star trails. The second graph was near the polar star. The graph looks better, with lower error, but each time i tried to do a 6 min exposure i was getting noticeable star trails. Why is this and how do i remove this error?
- Any tips on my guiding based on the graphs in general?

Any tips appreciated.
Cheers, Boz.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Capture.JPG)
62.8 KB26 views
Click for full-size image (Capture2.JPG)
146.5 KB32 views
Click for full-size image (Capture3.JPG)
123.9 KB23 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2018, 10:31 PM
Imme (Jon)
Registered User

Imme is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kyneton
Posts: 840
I would go longer exposures....much longer.
1 second and you’re chasing seeing. Try 5
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-09-2018, 06:53 AM
boz_m (Alexander)
Registered User

boz_m is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 19
Thanks imme. Will try longer guide exposures.

Btw I think the issue with bad guiding at the pole is differential flex ire in the guide scope. I had a look and it wasn’t secured fantastically and was probably shifting slightly when I changed position in the sky. Will tighten it all up and give it another whirl tonight.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2018, 07:02 AM
kens (Ken)
Registered User

kens is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 314
In case you haven't already found it, here's the PHD2 Best Practices document:
https://openphdguiding.org/PHD2_BestPractices.pdf

Guiding VERY close to the pole is interesting. On the one hand there is almost no periodic error in RA but the RA and Dec corrections are almost parallel. You also can get significant field rotation. On the few occasions I've done it I disable RA corrections and make sure your PA is spot on to prevent field rotation. This calculator helps work out how good your PA needs to be. http://celestialwonders.com/tools/ro...ErrorCalc.html
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement