Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-01-2007, 09:33 PM
chrissarah
Registered User

chrissarah is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sale
Posts: 8
New telescope

Hi Guys,
I know you guys bagged out the 127 mm celestron that i purchased... but i tell you its given me the ability to convince my wife we need a decent one
so maybe its not so bad... after learning how to use the equatorial mount i have found saturn although it appears rather small... maybe thats normal.. im new remember... and the mai galaxy was quite impressive... anyway
i been looking around.. and i happen to come across the telescope in a local store SKYWATCHER 130MM Reflector with tracking
could you guys give me some feedback on this telescope..
is it ok... while i have convinced sarah that we need a new telescope.. im not sure how much the word "DECENT" extends to in the budget...
i would howoever for the money im spending to have a tracker on it.. which is why this hit me straight up..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-01-2007, 09:38 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
You'd be gaining absolutely nothing in aperture. I wouldn't bother.

Keep saving for something around 8" (200mm) or even 10" in a reflector.

Most folk here will recommend a Dobsonion in that aperture.

I won't get involved in that argument. I've always mounted my scopes on a German Equatorial Mount (GEM)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-01-2007, 10:10 PM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
Don't even think about it, you need to jump to at least an 8" to get a decent return for your hard earned. Doesn't matter what type of scope or mount we are talking about you need to go up by about 4" increments to make the upgrade worthwhile.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-01-2007, 11:44 PM
Eternal
Registered User

Eternal is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bankstown
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrissarah View Post
Hi Guys,
I know you guys bagged out the 127 mm celestron that i purchased... but i tell you its given me the ability to convince my wife we need a decent one
so maybe its not so bad... after learning how to use the equatorial mount i have found saturn although it appears rather small... maybe thats normal.. im new remember... and the mai galaxy was quite impressive... anyway
i been looking around.. and i happen to come across the telescope in a local store SKYWATCHER 130MM Reflector with tracking
could you guys give me some feedback on this telescope..
is it ok... while i have convinced sarah that we need a new telescope.. im not sure how much the word "DECENT" extends to in the budget...
i would howoever for the money im spending to have a tracker on it.. which is why this hit me straight up..
That's exactly the same scope I purchased over two months ago. I used it for about two-three weeks before deciding I needed more aperture. After reviewing every damn scope out there I ended up going for a skywatcher SW600 (newtonian 8" with EQ5 mount with motors and stainless steel tripod legs) for about $1200. The reason why I opted for an EQ mount instead of a Dobson was becuase of my interest in astrophotography.

I think it's fair to say that anything from 8" up, whether it be a GSO dob or a skywatcher newtonian, you'll be getting good value for money.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-01-2007, 02:38 AM
Gama's Avatar
Gama
Registered User

Gama is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,121
Dito with all of the answers, you really need large aperature. Look at the second hand prices, as theres always a bargain going.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-01-2007, 02:09 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
$400 for a 8" GSO dob.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-01-2007, 02:27 PM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
Ditto with the others, 8 inch is really the minimum you should consider.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-01-2007, 03:09 PM
duncan's Avatar
duncan
Duncan

duncan is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weipa FNQld
Posts: 1,091
Made up Mind

Having considered the options i think i'm going to get a 12"Meade Lightbridge (about $1500.00) and then save to get Argo Navis for it ($1130.00).This way I'll have reasonable portability, excellent viewing capabilities visually and eventually the capability to do my astro photo stuff as well. Anyone got any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-01-2007, 03:16 PM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
I like spending your money

Now you won't be disappointed with that choice.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement