Hi Mick
I've had an 11" Celestron Nexstar for 3 years and used a CPC too for a short period this year - they're optically identical. Because of the long focal length of the instrument, you'll find the problem is in getting low powers and wide fields.
A 32mm eyepiece isn't much good in a 1 1/4" size as the narrow barrel size limits the field of view. You need to go for a 2" eyepiece, at least for your lowest power - it'll make a world of difference. I'd highly recommend the Andrews 30mm 2" 80 degree at $150. Poor man's Nagler with pretty good quality, decreasing somwhat towards the outer edge but I'm very happy with mine and use it a lot.
http://www.andrewscom.com.au/site-section-10.htm
This will give you a lowest power of 93 with nearly a 1 degree apparent field of view. You'll feel like you were looking down a drainpipe before.
If you can afford it, try to select wide field eyepieces for your shorter focal lengths too. I have 27mm and 19mm Panoptics, and 14, 10.5 and 7mm Pentax XLs with about 70 degree fields. The 10.5 produces 270x with a 1/4 degree field and only on rare occasions will the atmosphere allow you to use anything shorter than this. There are cheaper alternatives in other brands. The fairly new William Optic UWANs (ultra wides) have been getting excellent reviews - there is a 16mm with 80 degree field for about $260 which would be great with this scope.
If you can afford the 2" version of a UHC filter, it can be screwed into the 2" diagonal and serve for all your eyepeices.