Quote:
Originally Posted by Sausageman
... that they are too unstable without major modification ...
|
Don't believe everything they say. MAPUG in particular is good at talking a lot of trash. If you learn the equipment and work with it not against it, the super wedge is just fine and just as capable as the Milburne and other wedges.
When using any wedge there are techniques you can use to make adjusting them dead easy. Such as accurately timing star drift and learning to watch the star in the eyepiece while making adjustments (or if unable to reach, between small adjustments) to know how far in what direction the star moves. Doing that you will not have any problems with backlash or adjustment and will achieve polar alignment much quicker as you know exactly how far to move the star (via adjusting the wedge) for the second adjustment.
I have been using a super wedge for many years and have no problem with it considering the alternatives. I would prefer a completely solid welded wedge which would be more sturdy than any adjustable one, but haven't got that sorted yet.
Any wedge is better than a field rotator in my opinion.
The only downside to a wedge is perhaps extra setup time when using it with a portable setup, but it's the best alternative if you are looking long exposure photography.