Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-11-2017, 09:47 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Small Magellanic Cloud RGB

Well, here is the first 21 hours on the Small Magellanic Cloud. Still planning on getting some Ha and OIII for masses of nebulosity and getting some better quality luminance once I get the new scope collimated in the coming weeks.

It is a 15 panel mosaic with 14x120s RGB per frame so far. If all goes to plan I'll add another 45 hours. This was taken over four nights from Sunday - Wednesday at Heathcote, Vic.

High Res Version

65 Megapixel annotated version (~13mb) at ~2.2"/pixel
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Small Magellanic Cloud IIS.jpg)
160.2 KB100 views

Last edited by Atmos; 27-11-2017 at 05:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-11-2017, 10:20 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,658
That looks great Colin, got the whole lot in there ...if I was to fork out and get the Tak 645 reducer for my FSQ, I would have about this same FOV but in one shot ...I'm contemplating....

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-11-2017, 10:38 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,175
Fantastic Colin.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-11-2017, 10:59 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
That looks great Colin, got the whole lot in there ...if I was to fork out and get the Tak 645 reducer for my FSQ, I would have about this same FOV but in one shot ...I'm contemplating....

Mike
If you got 21 hours of RGB with your setup and reducer the depth you’d achieve would be mind boggling! There is something to be said for fitting the whole lot in one field but you also wouldn’t be able to display it as a whopping 750MP image at full res

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Fantastic Colin.

Greg.
Thanks Greg
Took half an hour to actually process all 15 panels but five days in pre-processing!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-11-2017, 11:13 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
but you also wouldn’t be able to display it as a whopping 750MP image at full res
Yeah I could, just upsize it in Photoshop
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-11-2017, 12:04 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,781
Nice work Colin,
I wish I could see the 82 MByte version but it won't download.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-11-2017, 12:49 AM
IanP
Registered User

IanP is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: West Coast
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
i wish i could see the 82 mbyte version but it won't download.
+1
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-11-2017, 04:16 AM
Christopher-26
Registered User

Christopher-26 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Italy
Posts: 13
Amazing! If these are only 21 hours, I can't imagine how it will be with other 45 hours.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-11-2017, 09:08 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Yeah I could, just upsize it in Photoshop
You could drizzle to get to around 65mp

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Nice work Colin,
I wish I could see the 82 MByte version but it won't download.

cheers
Allan
Thankfully it’s only a 24mb file but 82mp. Not sure why it isn’t loading, I’ve asked Mr. Astrobin himself and wondering if there may be a 10,000 pixel limit or something.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher-26 View Post
Amazing! If these are only 21 hours, I can't imagine how it will be with other 45 hours.
Nebulosity will pop a lot more
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-11-2017, 11:13 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,467
Beautiful Colin looks like the new scope is working out well...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-11-2017, 11:20 AM
Andy01's Avatar
Andy01 (Andy)
My God it's full of stars

Andy01 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,279
Lovely work there Colin. Co-incidentally I'm working on a 2 panel HaO3RGB mosaic of the same region myself.
If it looks even half as good as yours here I'll be a happy boy, well done!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-11-2017, 11:51 AM
Retrograde's Avatar
Retrograde (Pete)
a.k.a. @AstroscapePete

Retrograde is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,715
Yes this is great. Amazing resolution!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27-11-2017, 05:02 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Very well done, awesome processing.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27-11-2017, 05:20 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelopardalis View Post
Beautiful Colin looks like the new scope is working out well...
Even though it isn't working perfectly yet, it is such a wonderful thing to use. This is the first reflector that I've used for imaging and I have to say, I'm not used to the perfect colour correction! The colour correction of the refractors I've used has been very good but just not as perfect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy01 View Post
Lovely work there Colin. Co-incidentally I'm working on a 2 panel HaO3RGB mosaic of the same region myself.
If it looks even half as good as yours here I'll be a happy boy, well done!
Your FOV is a smidgen larger than mine Andy You'll be able to put significantly more exposure time into any given area so I'm looking forward to your depth. My plan is for 60-70 hours in total but being spread over so many frames, each panel doesn't actually have a huge amount of data.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Retrograde View Post
Yes this is great. Amazing resolution!
After I get some good luminance I am hoping for much better resolution. At the moment the uploaded version is ~2"/pixel but I am planning on a 0.65"/pixel version. Just waiting for some adapters to arrive so that I can collimate the beast.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidU View Post
Very well done, awesome processing.
After days of calibration, registration, stacking and drizzle integrating the actual processing was very quick and easy.
Load a RGB panel onto Mike & Trish's GoodLook 64, push two buttons to set the black point and colour, then save. Repeat for all 15 panels. Open in MaximDL, push the DPP button and then the 3x3 bin, repeat for all 15 panels. Very quick and easy.

65 Megapixel annotated version (~13mb) at ~2.2"/pixel

Last edited by Atmos; 27-11-2017 at 05:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28-11-2017, 07:01 AM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
That's wonderful, Colin. Beautifully planned and executed.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 28-11-2017, 08:17 AM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,052
I just swam through the large 1 - loved it

Best
JA
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 28-11-2017, 12:15 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,454
Serious effort here and a great result.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 28-11-2017, 08:20 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,781
Nice job Colin,
It's a great atlas of that area of the sky.

I had forgotten all about NGC 362 - the globular cluster.
Everyone always looks at Tuc 47 instead.
Then I checked it out & the HST has a pic of it:
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap171011.html

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 28-11-2017, 10:06 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
That's wonderful, Colin. Beautifully planned and executed.
Thanks
GoodLook certainly helps with its quick and easy black point setting and colour calibrating. Even if my laptop has to work hard when editing 65mp images in it hehe

Quote:
Originally Posted by JA View Post
I just swam through the large 1 - loved it

Best
JA
There is just something that super high resolution images show that cannot be displayed just by going with shorter focal length

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Serious effort here and a great result.
Thanks Peter. Would love to see what your Honders could make of the region!

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Nice job Colin,
It's a great atlas of that area of the sky.

I had forgotten all about NGC 362 - the globular cluster.
Everyone always looks at Tuc 47 instead.
Then I checked it out & the HST has a pic of it:
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap171011.html

cheers
Allan
Hubble definitely wins against my out of collimation 600mm scope NGC 362 is the forgotten GC in the region. I kinda feel like I should point my Mewlon at one night and see what I can get.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 28-11-2017, 10:31 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post

Hubble definitely wins against my out of collimation 600mm scope NGC 362 is the forgotten GC in the region. I kinda feel like I should point my Mewlon at one night and see what I can get.

Hi Colin,
Yes - the Mewlon would have the focal length to zoom in on it.
It's a really interesting glob with so many different colours.
I don't know if anyone from here has tried for the best possible pic of it yet?
Maybe it's bright enough to take advantage of lucky imaging with
many 100s of short exposures?

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement