Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-09-2016, 06:59 AM
batema's Avatar
batema (Mark)
Registered User

batema is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,829
Ngc 6726

God I am struggling with this. ADVICE desperately needed.

6 hours luminance with 2 h each colour channel. Shot from my backyard in the suburbs on the Sunshine Coast. taken with TEC 140 and SBIG STT 8300m on AP 1100.

Help please.

Mark
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (LRGB finished 2 cropped reduced.jpg)
179.1 KB99 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2016, 07:03 AM
batema's Avatar
batema (Mark)
Registered User

batema is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,829
Sorry. Lum subs were 15 minutes binning 1x1 and colour channels were 10 minutes binning 2x2 as I read somewhere that the 2x2 binning long subs would bring out the dust.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2016, 07:31 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Some good data there Mark.

The dynamic range looks too flattened. By that I mean the bright areas are dulled down like the glob and the bright core stars in the blue neb.

So work with curves and levels to restore the dynamic range.

Colourwise there is a fair bit of green light pollution. I would run HLVG free plug in at strong level to correct or if you have PI use ACDNR.

The blues need to be brought up as the reflection neb should be more colourful than that.

Then work with the colour in general. There are some too heavy red halos around some stars. That may require the saturation of red/yellow reduced or decon on the red master image to reduce the size of the red component as perhaps it was out of focus slightly, taken at a low angle or seeing worsened when doing the red channel.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2016, 08:46 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
I am far from an expert, but is this the look you are after?

HLVG green removed
Multiple layer adjustments
Level and curve adjustments
Contrast boost with some masking


Poor quality working off a jpeg.

Had always iffy results in Sippy Downs. All the sodium street lamps like Las Vegas
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (mark corona.jpg)
142.1 KB65 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2016, 07:01 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Mark,ok so a punchy pic is the in thing these days yeah....but don't think for a minute that you haven't done a very good job here! It's a very good image dude
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-2016, 09:17 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Looks like pretty good data and you've had plenty of useful advice already, Mark. I'd just add one thing: you really don't need to bin LRGB with that set up, especially under relatively bright skies.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-09-2016, 11:43 AM
batema's Avatar
batema (Mark)
Registered User

batema is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,829
Revamped NGC 6726

Hi,

Have applied the advice as best I can. This is a total of 12 hours and 30 minutes 7 being luminance and 1h 50m each colour channel. Removed the green with the free action thanks and did some layered masking to enhance the nebula.

Comments and advice greatly appreciated.

Mark
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (LRGB  cropped reduced.jpg)
169.2 KB40 views
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-09-2016, 08:52 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
That's a great shot Mark. Excellent data too.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-09-2016, 02:24 PM
batema's Avatar
batema (Mark)
Registered User

batema is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,829
Thanks Marc.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-09-2016, 09:31 PM
batema's Avatar
batema (Mark)
Registered User

batema is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,829
Marc how are you able to tell that I have good data. I read this comment in peoples posts and i do not really understand what it means.?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-09-2016, 03:59 AM
p1taylor's Avatar
p1taylor
Registered User

p1taylor is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: coventry uk
Posts: 734
Thanks for sharing.

peter
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-10-2016, 09:48 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
you won't get detail and depth like that from poor data Mark - that is a fine image.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-10-2016, 10:48 PM
batema's Avatar
batema (Mark)
Registered User

batema is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,829
Thanks Peter and Ray.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-10-2016, 11:22 PM
Regulus's Avatar
Regulus (Trevor)
Regulus - Couer de Leon

Regulus is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Devonport, Tasmania
Posts: 2,350
Great shot Mark, and the second treatment works nicely. Doesn't seem to loose detail, and the colour improves (esp. in the cluster at the top right).
Lovely image.

Trev
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement