Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 09-07-2016, 10:59 AM
Max Vondel's Avatar
Max Vondel (Peter)
Time Traveller

Max Vondel is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bairnsdale VIC
Posts: 437
LP 110mm Refractor

Saw the LP, ED APO 110mm f/6 QUADRUPLET refractor with ED FPL-51+NBM51 lens and new heavy duty bearing type 2.7" 11:1 microfocuser! listed and Andrews comms..... Has anyone tried one of these refractors?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-07-2016, 10:52 AM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
Not me , but going by its spec's it would be a nice scope , as good as any WO , SV or others at a better price .

Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-07-2016, 12:51 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Vondel View Post
Saw the LP, ED APO 110mm f/6 QUADRUPLET refractor with ED FPL-51+NBM51 lens and new heavy duty bearing type 2.7" 11:1 microfocuser! listed and Andrews comms..... Has anyone tried one of these refractors?

That scope has been on the Andrews for quite some time (years) so it's not new. I seem to remember reading some negative comment somewhere, but it may simply have been questioning the 'risk' of keeping four elements aligned properly.

Of course, now we have six-element scopes but their robustness in maintaining alignment over time remains to be seen.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-07-2016, 07:07 PM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,505
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=117848
https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/1...apo-refractor/
Hope that helps
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-07-2016, 10:08 PM
ab1963 (Andrew)
Refractors-That’s It

ab1963 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Rangeville, Toowoomba
Posts: 441
It seems from what I've gathered about the LP scopes is the weak link seems to be in the quality control department so what Morton is saying is probably right
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2016, 02:59 PM
Max Vondel's Avatar
Max Vondel (Peter)
Time Traveller

Max Vondel is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bairnsdale VIC
Posts: 437
Thanks for your feedback
Might try another WO
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-07-2016, 09:21 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Morton more elements don't necessarily mean better optically, often they're not.

Frankly a Thomas Cooke 4.25" f/15 achro doublet made in the 1880's (my school had this work of art) craps all over the modem fast refractors when it comes to resolution and chromatic aberration at high power. The only downside was its size, and the size of the massive mount it has, together with tripod or pier.

The modern refractors are short primarily because of the size of the mount needed to hold a long OTA rigidly; it's a lot cheaper to make it f/6 or 7, on a small cheap mount, and stick a few more lenses inside than to use an f/15 OTA and the much bigger heavier mount and tripod.

Last edited by Wavytone; 12-07-2016 at 09:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement