Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-06-2016, 03:05 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
PI Deconvolution Question

I've been playing wit PixInsight Deconvolution today but have been unable to get a result I'm completely happy with. This issue is the medium size stars get a white dot in the centre and this gets worse with more iterations. Is there a way to prevent this effect in Decon settings or is there a post-deconvolution fix?

Cheers,

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-06-2016, 03:20 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Are you using a deringing mask, Peter?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-06-2016, 03:52 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Yes I'm using a deringing mask created with the star mask process and a lum mask using an STF->HT stretched clone of the original
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-06-2016, 06:50 AM
mostschaedel's Avatar
mostschaedel (Gerald)
mostschaedel

mostschaedel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ebreichsdorf Austria
Posts: 60
Let us have on dropbox your fits file you want to deconvolute.
Will try to solve the issue and provide the parameter...

The finding of the correct parameter is very tricky.

Gerald
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-06-2016, 03:16 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter_4059 View Post
Yes I'm using a deringing mask created with the star mask process and a lum mask using an STF->HT stretched clone of the original
Hi Peter,

I usually see some brightening of star cores from decon but nothing that looks bad, so I assume this is something different.

If, as Gerald suggested, you're willing to put a copy of the image somewhere I'd be happy to have a play with it.

Just a thought... is the data linear or stretched?

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-06-2016, 03:21 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Thanks for the offers. The image is still linear. I've been sick today but will get it on dropbox when I get a chance.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-06-2016, 03:24 PM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
I get a hard edge around saturated cores, which might be what you're talking about, when I don't protect them during decon.

When applying decon I create a luminance mask like you do, although I make the background near black, and try to push the midtones a lot so that I get good decon on my target and less "noise enhancement".

After creating that mask, I then create a star mask (from the original) to capture any of those stars with saturated cores (I usually go with a scale of 5 for this). I then subtract that star mask from the luminance mask I created initially, and then use the resulting mask to protect the image when performing the decon.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-06-2016, 10:14 AM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
I've put the files in dropbox:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/x8z6q2c9k...6nBmA7Rta?dl=0

I've included:
1. the image pre-decon
2. the PSF used in my decon
3. the deringing mask used in my decon
4. the Lum mask used in my decon
5. the post decon image (50 its)
6. the post decon image with a masked conv of the stars to get rid of the bright pixels
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-06-2016, 11:20 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Peter,

I grabbed a copy of the files and will have a closer look at them this evening unless someone beats me to it...

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-06-2016, 11:23 AM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Thanks Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-06-2016, 08:01 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Hi Peter,

I can't start by reproducing your results because the Pre_Deconv image has a different crop to the masks and the PostDecon image, but... I think the problem you are having is just that you're trying to do a heavy decon on the nebula and this is too heavy on the stars (a perfectly deconvoluted star will become a point source.)

If you want to go that heavy then you'll need to do something like Lee suggested and remove the brighter star cores from the luminance mask. You could subtract a suitably constructed star mask or use PixelMath, e.g. "iif($T>0.6,0,$T)" followed by a slight Convolution blur to take out the star cores.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21-06-2016, 12:55 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
There. I fixed it.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (prawn-decon.jpg)
52.8 KB40 views
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21-06-2016, 01:21 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by troypiggo View Post
There. I fixed it.
Nah, you overcooked it Troy
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21-06-2016, 05:33 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Troy, I was going to say it's a bit green but I guess that would make it undercooked.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-07-2016, 08:57 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Hi Peter,

I just had a similar decon problem. I solved it by using a conventional SNR mask and running a small decon (10 iterations) then I clobbered the stars in the SNR mask [PixelMath: iif(star_mask>0.2,0,$T) followed by a gentle Convolution blur] then hit it with a heavy decon (100 iterations.) That has done the trick and given a gentle star reduction without making them too crispy and still done a strong decon on the nebulosity.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-07-2016, 06:13 AM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
Can you elaborate on a "conventional SNR mask" please?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-07-2016, 07:08 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by troypiggo View Post
Can you elaborate on a "conventional SNR mask" please?
A black clipped luminance mask just exposing the bright areas.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-07-2016, 03:48 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Thanks for the tips Rick. I collected some more data last night so have had another go at this from scratch. Still getting the bright cores in the stars from decon but have applied some convolution with a star mask and this seems to tame it a bit. There is a lot of Ha in this region!

Thanks for looking.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IC4628_s.jpg)
193.1 KB36 views
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-07-2016, 05:53 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
A black clipped luminance mask just exposing the bright areas.
Cheers mate. Figured it was some kind of lum mask.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement