Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-10-2015, 10:01 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
New Zeiss 21mm F2.8 Loxia lens for nightscapes

Zeiss has just announced this lens.

I am excited by this puppy. I want one of these soonest for my Sony A7R or perhaps a future A7rii camera for nightscapes.

It should be amazing. Time to retire the Nikon 14-24mm maybe.

And its tiny and lightweight - mirrorless strikes again!

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/856...r-sony-e-mount

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-10-2015, 10:14 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Get one and let us know how well it works, please Greg!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-10-2015, 07:01 AM
N1 (Mirko)
Registered User

N1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Dunners Nu Zulland
Posts: 1,786
Bit slow maybe at f/2.8?
IQ should be top notch though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-10-2015, 05:38 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Get one and let us know how well it works, please Greg!
I am preordering one as soon as I get prices. Its probably going to be around $2,000 or more. The Loxia 35 F2 is $1999 for example.



Quote:
Originally Posted by N1 View Post
Bit slow maybe at f/2.8?
IQ should be top notch though.

I haven't found a fast lens that does not need to be stopped down to at best F2 and really F2.8 anyway. Most fast lenses suffer from bad chromatic aberration which is not an issue when used with terrestrial images as you usually want to blur the background with the fast lens so the aberration is not a liability.

F2.8 is perfect from my use. F2.8, 21mm and ISO 3200 or 6400 should get a nicely exposed shot.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-10-2015, 08:42 AM
N1 (Mirko)
Registered User

N1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Dunners Nu Zulland
Posts: 1,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
I haven't found a fast lens that does not need to be stopped down to at best F2 and really F2.8 anyway. Most fast lenses suffer from bad chromatic aberration which is not an issue when used with terrestrial images as you usually want to blur the background with the fast lens so the aberration is not a liability.
Not sure which one is better - a fast lens stopped down to f/2.8 or an f/2.8 being used wide open. Looking forward to your observations.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-10-2015, 09:19 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by N1 View Post
Not sure which one is better - a fast lens stopped down to f/2.8 or an f/2.8 being used wide open. Looking forward to your observations.
I think it depends on the lenses performance. The Nikon 14-24 is perfect wide open. So is the Fuji XF 14mm F2.8. Most lenses aren't though and usually peak around F5.6.

This lens is $2099 from Leederville in Perth and available mid December.

I think I'll preorder it as samples on the net are fabulous. Zeiss Otus 28mm F1.4 just released as well and one is a nightscape and it looks stunning also but apart from the cost (its out of my league) 28mm is a bit long focal length for nightscapes. Its being touted as the best wide angle lens in the world and it probably is for 28mm.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement