Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-09-2015, 08:38 PM
jwoody's Avatar
jwoody (Jeremy)
Registered User

jwoody is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ormeau Hills, Australia
Posts: 372
Downgrading from a Tak FSQ85 to a Espirit 80. Am I crazy?(Decision made keeping FSQ)

Hello
In order to raise funds for a KAF 8300 mono (most likely a QHY9) camera I am thinking of selling my Takahashi FSQ85 and instead using a Skywatcher Esprit 80ED.
Am I nuts?
The 80ed comes with the doublet field flattener and whilst a skywatcher is no Tak I believe that it is a pretty good little scope.
Thoughts?

Thank you
Jeremy

Last edited by jwoody; 13-09-2015 at 08:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2015, 08:49 PM
Logieberra's Avatar
Logieberra (Logan)
Registered User

Logieberra is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,642
You'll miss the Tak
And all to wind up with a cheapy QHY...
I'd hold off.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2015, 09:23 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Imho the Explore Scientific ED80 APO Triplet is a better buy, and ES make a nice flattener for it with no reduction.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-09-2015, 09:28 PM
Somnium's Avatar
Somnium (Aidan)
Aidan

Somnium is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,669
keep the Tak, find other ways to get the money together for the ccd, go without coffee for a while, beg or borrow. there are better ways than selling such a nice scope
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-09-2015, 10:06 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
What Logan and Aidan said.

Also think a bot more on CCD choice.... 8300 chip yes, QHY....well...

SBIG and Atik 8300 chipped cameras are well priced and hassle free.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2015, 09:43 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,466
Regardless of what the brand snobs here say, you're unlikely to notice the difference between the FSQ85 and the Esprit.

But I'd doubt you'd make enough cash in the sale to achieve your goal. Hold tight and raise the funds another way.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2015, 10:01 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Dunk is right on a few things -

A new QHY9 is $3000

A new Esprit 80 is $1849

$4849 total, without post.

Most I have seen a 2nd hand FSQ85 go for is $3500.

And you won't get any gains using an Esprit 80 over the FSQ 85.

Keep what you have, find another way if you can. Sell the Mak and the RC6
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2015, 10:05 AM
Logieberra's Avatar
Logieberra (Logan)
Registered User

Logieberra is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelopardalis View Post
Regardless of what the brand snobs here say, you're unlikely to notice the difference between the FSQ85 and the Esprit.

But I'd doubt you'd make enough cash in the sale to achieve your goal. Hold tight and raise the funds another way.
That's a bit harsh? The FSQs have near perfect colour correction and importantly - an inherently flat field - meaning no fiddly adapters needed for perfect spacing of an external flattener. That matters. Check out some of the excellent shots done by Peter Ward and others with the BabyQ:-

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=105036
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-09-2015, 10:20 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
The FSQ85 performs magnificently.

I have also seen some VERY good shots from the Esprit 80 and 100.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2015, 11:51 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
You will miss those tiny pinpoint stars if you do get rid of the FSQ.

But, then again, all stars do is get in the way of nebulae.

H
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-09-2015, 03:09 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
But, then again, all stars do is get in the way of nebulae.

H
I thought stars are a vital stage in otherwise meaningless lives of nebulae so that suitable conditions for life to evolve can be manufactured eventually allowing intellectual animals to invent means for photographing the nebulae!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-09-2015, 03:39 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logieberra View Post
That's a bit harsh? The FSQs have near perfect colour correction and importantly - an inherently flat field - meaning no fiddly adapters needed for perfect spacing of an external flattener. That matters. Check out some of the excellent shots done by Peter Ward and others with the BabyQ:-
Why is it harsh?

And how difficult is it it to attach a flattener to a scope? The flattener that the Esprit comes with screws on to the rear of the scope. If anyone in this game lacks the ability to thread on an accessory, then they're not going to get very far

Btw, I never said the FSQ85 wasn't a great scope. But really, is it 2-3x better than an 80mm Esprit?

I've seen excellent images from both scopes...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-09-2015, 04:05 PM
SpaceNoob (Chris)
Atlas Observatory

SpaceNoob is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelopardalis View Post
Why is it harsh?

And how difficult is it it to attach a flattener to a scope? The flattener that the Esprit comes with screws on to the rear of the scope. If anyone in this game lacks the ability to thread on an accessory, then they're not going to get very far

Btw, I never said the FSQ85 wasn't a great scope. But really, is it 2-3x better than an 80mm Esprit?

I've seen excellent images from both scopes...
Only so far you can polish a turd.... just saying...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-09-2015, 04:07 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelopardalis View Post
Regardless of what the brand snobs here say, you're unlikely to notice the difference between the FSQ85 and the Esprit.

But I'd doubt you'd make enough cash in the sale to achieve your goal. Hold tight and raise the funds another way.
Brand Snobs eh? Just can't resist stirring the pot here....are people that buy Tak's or Tele Vue's really going to lower themselves to the level of the Proletariat just to save some money? They buy those brands to differentiate themselves, and because they can afford to, which is differentiation in itself. Performance differences which are undetectable to 99% of users are irrelevant to the elites (or those that aspire to the ellusive 1%). So even selling a lower end Tak to finance an alternative will, to them, always be unacceptable - the answer, of course, is to spend more money to stay elite.

Want perfect colours without the need for expensive "near perfect correction" just get a Newt. Pin point stars, and perfect colour, a Mak-Newt.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-09-2015, 04:14 PM
SpaceNoob (Chris)
Atlas Observatory

SpaceNoob is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
But are people that buy Tak's or Tele Vue's really going to lower themselves to the level of the Proletariat just to save some money? They buy those brands to differentiate themselves, and because they can afford to, which is differentiation in itself. Performance differences which are undetectable to 99% of users are irrelevant to the elites (or those that aspire to the ellusive 1%). So even selling a lower end Tak to finance an alternative will, to them, always be unacceptable - the answer, of course, is to spend more money to stay elite.
There's nothing elite or 1% between the two scopes discussed here.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-09-2015, 05:04 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
Brand Snobs eh? Just can't resist stirring the pot here....are people that buy Tak's or Tele Vue's really going to lower themselves to the level of the Proletariat just to save some money? They buy those brands to differentiate themselves, and because they can afford to, which is differentiation in itself. Performance differences which are undetectable to 99% of users are irrelevant to the elites (or those that aspire to the ellusive 1%). So even selling a lower end Tak to finance an alternative will, to them, always be unacceptable - the answer, of course, is to spend more money to stay elite.

Want perfect colours without the need for expensive "near perfect correction" just get a Newt. Pin point stars, and perfect colour, a Mak-Newt.
That's the problem with a bad case of brandsnobitis, Glen...those that suffer, make bold claims to support their more expensive purchase but don't generally back it with empirical evidence
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-09-2015, 05:36 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Freud would have had a field day.... anyone want to whip it out and empirically compare?

Yes Dunk, there is loads of empirical data out there on the optical quality of the Taks and the Esprits.

Esprit 80 - MANY samples:

http://interferometrie.blogspot.com....t-reports.html

Esprit 100:

http://interferometrie.blogspot.com.au/

And the Tak FSQ-85EDX:

http://r2.astro-foren.com/index.php/...petzval-system

Call it a tie! Yes, the Esprits are good.

The only reason I chose the FSQ-106 over the Esprit 100 or 120 was mounting considerations and my desire for an inbuilt flattener that did NOT need spacing (the Sharpstar/TS/Stellarvue 100Q was also in contention but this scope is NOT a good performer). Even SW must consider the FSQ great considering how many design features they copied from the FSQ into the Esprits (capstan's Wheel, sliding dew shield style, focuser lock etc).

I would say yes, the Esprits are well polished - the Strehl and wave figures prove it. Polished turds they are NOT - polished gems I would say.

The Chinese are catching up fast - they realise second best is no longer acceptable to many - not merely the elite. The Esprits represent significant value for money, and perform as well as many of the recognised top shelf scopes.

The Esprits have their flaws (copying Tak's KNOWN flaws was an odd decision!), but every scope does. Why we cannot discuss flaws, errors, omissions and foibles of scopes without reverting to condescending back-chat is churlish.

Would I complement my Tak FSQ-106N with an Esprit 80? Most probably, yes, if I felt the need.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-09-2015, 06:03 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Interesting reports, thank you Lewis.

I have quickly made a rough comparison (see the attached files) using data from here: http://www.airylab.fr/AirylabUS/index.php?option=com_content&view=a rticle&id=52&Itemid=57

The website did not have a report for Esprit, thus I used data from the report for Skywatcher's Equinox, but of course Esprit, being more expensive and more refined than Equinox, should yield better results.

The reason why I am interested in this discussion is that even with narrowband imaging, light at a range of wavelengths and with longer exposures will slowly leak through a filter, in particular around bright stars, creating halos and enlarging stars to some degree. I have noticed that with my ED doublet and 3nm filters. And although I am not in a rush, I have been looking at possible reasonable future replacement for my TS doublet.

Going back to the original question, if one is after the best possible astro-images, then perhaps FSQ might be better to some degree (than Esprit). But whether Jeremy’s mount (HEQ5) will allow to fully capitalise on FSQ’s excellent optics – I do not know.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Strehl.jpg)
55.9 KB47 views
Click for full-size image (Spot Diagrams.jpg)
111.9 KB43 views
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-09-2015, 06:17 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Fantastic Slawomir! URAH! Nothing like fact over fiction, BUT, you will need to incorporate specific Esprit performance for an accurate analysis and comparison. The Equinox ED is quite different.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-09-2015, 06:23 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Try the Esprit 150 data Slaw: http://airylab.net/contenu/mesures/a...2012-03001.pdf

FSQ-106EDXIII:
http://www.airylab.com/contenu/mesur...14-20002-a.pdf

FSQ-106ED:

http://airylab.net/contenu/mesures/a...2014-41002.pdf

And FSQ-85EDX:

http://www.airylab.com/contenu/mesur...14-08001-a.pdf
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement