Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-09-2006, 09:26 AM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Deep SMC with 100ED

I used up a whole clear night to get this image. Twelve fifteen minute exposures with in camera noise reduction on takes just over six hours. I am sure it was worth it.
Details
Canon 5DH, Orion 100ED with Astro Physics focal reducer so 640mm at F6.4, 12X15 min at ISO 400, corrected for flats with ImagesPlus, stacked with RegiStar, digitally developed with IP, levels and curves in PS.

Large image 1.9MB
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~trlee8/SMC_100ED.jpg

here is the SMC taken at 300mm from a previous post
3MB
http://users.bigpond.net.au/avandonk/SMC_m.jpg

Bert
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (SMC_100ED_sm.jpg)
75.6 KB57 views
Click for full-size image (smc_+2.jpg)
70.8 KB46 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-09-2006, 09:48 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,425
So how much difference would there have been if you did it in ISO 800? Very nice work Bert. CS
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-09-2006, 10:21 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
never knew you had an ed100 bert. great images.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-09-2006, 11:47 AM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Great shot - you really need to look at the full res one to really appreciate it though....
Heaps of DSO's in that DSO isn't there!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-09-2006, 11:49 AM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
hOughy the signal to noise or dynamic range decreases as you use higher ISO. You get an image quicker but the noise is far worse at high ISO. If you look carefully there are wall to wall resolved dim stars in the background, these would be lost in the noise at higher ISO than 400. It is a bit like life you have to make compromises in this case between speed (sensitivity) and quality (signal to noise). Its like what you do at a seance, strike a happy medium.
The other reason I went for it was that the ambient temperature was close to zero over the imaging period. This further enhanced the signal to noise.

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-09-2006, 04:00 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Great work Bert. 180 mins, thats a marathon effort. Yes, if you can go for exposures of 5 minutes or more, low ISO's seem to be the go. I shoot iso 200 when imaging without the UHCS filter, any higher and the sky is too bright, though I tend to stick to higher iso's when using the filters on the 10 inch.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-09-2006, 05:31 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Thats a great effort Berty Beetle...you sure have some serious exposure time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement