Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-06-2015, 10:54 PM
alocky's Avatar
alocky (Andrew lockwood)
PI popular people's front

alocky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: perth australia
Posts: 1,291
SMC at f3.6

And here's another from Monday night: This time with the focal reducer on the FSQ giving me f3.6 at 397mm fl.
Subs are 60 seconds @ iso 6400 and there is about 30 minutes worth. It was quite challenging to get a decent colour balance in this as there was an annoying purple-red cast - which was caused by the aurora :-).
Here's the high res version on astrobin.
cheers again!
Andrew.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (smc_small.jpg)
198.7 KB114 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-06-2015, 11:09 PM
Somnium's Avatar
Somnium (Aidan)
Aidan

Somnium is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,669
looking great.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-06-2015, 11:17 PM
DavidTrap's Avatar
DavidTrap (David)
Really just a beginner

DavidTrap is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,043
Why weren't you photographing the Aurora?

Nice SMC BTW

DT
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-06-2015, 11:31 PM
alocky's Avatar
alocky (Andrew lockwood)
PI popular people's front

alocky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: perth australia
Posts: 1,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidTrap View Post
Why weren't you photographing the Aurora?

Nice SMC BTW

DT
Would you believe I didn't take a tripod! I have one photo using a 14mm lens resting on the lens cap on my picnic table. My face got stuck to the table while I was trying to focus and frame it (-2C!!) so I offset from infinity from memory. Even though I was completely sober at ~4:00am I didn't quite get it right, so the stars are a bit blobby. But I do have a wide shot of the aurora. I'm also quite pleased with myself for even registering it naked eye without having any knowledge of the forecast- it really wasn't that bright from here.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (DSC_0291.jpg)
182.9 KB45 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-06-2015, 06:41 AM
DavidTrap's Avatar
DavidTrap (David)
Really just a beginner

DavidTrap is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,043
Excused!

DT
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-06-2015, 09:33 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Massive FoV Andrew. Plenty to see. I was expecting to see the stars more finely resolved with the FSQ, yet its still a great image. Thanks for sharing.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-06-2015, 09:53 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Huge field of view with lots of objects in the field. That DSLR gives a nice smooth background too. One of the best field of view I have seen of this galaxy. The image shows the galaxy's twisted shape really well.

My only critique would be that I think the galaxy and 47 Tucanae are a little too magenta.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-06-2015, 02:16 PM
Regulus's Avatar
Regulus (Trevor)
Regulus - Couer de Leon

Regulus is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Devonport, Tasmania
Posts: 2,350
What Paul said. Really nice presentation.

Trev
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-06-2015, 04:02 PM
alocky's Avatar
alocky (Andrew lockwood)
PI popular people's front

alocky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: perth australia
Posts: 1,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
Massive FoV Andrew. Plenty to see. I was expecting to see the stars more finely resolved with the FSQ, yet its still a great image. Thanks for sharing.
They were - but I actually knocked the first three wavelet layers off in an attempt to get the HII regions to show through. With the reducer on, the FSQ is putting the stars into a single pixel. I'm now experimenting with the drizzle integration, but am really struggling to get the nebulosity to come through the stars.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
Huge field of view with lots of objects in the field. That DSLR gives a nice smooth background too. One of the best field of view I have seen of this galaxy. The image shows the galaxy's twisted shape really well.

My only critique would be that I think the galaxy and 47 Tucanae are a little too magenta.
Thanks Paul! I think I need to revisit this at lower ISO to try and get some more of the subtle structure to come through. BY trying to squeeze the detail out in the SMC I've made a complete mess of the colour.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulus View Post
What Paul said. Really nice presentation.

Trev
Thanks Trev - I'm going to park this one for a while and come back to it once I've got a bit of distance...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-06-2015, 09:57 PM
Rex's Avatar
Rex
Registered User

Rex is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Townsville, Australia
Posts: 991
Nice one Andy. That Camera does a fairly decent job indeed.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28-06-2015, 02:08 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
That's a great FOV, Andrew, and the image turned out quite nicely. I frequently use drizzle with a FSQ-106 and CCD camera with good results.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28-06-2015, 03:34 PM
alocky's Avatar
alocky (Andrew lockwood)
PI popular people's front

alocky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: perth australia
Posts: 1,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
That's a great FOV, Andrew, and the image turned out quite nicely. I frequently use drizzle with a FSQ-106 and CCD camera with good results.

Cheers,
Rick.
Thanks again Rick, the drizzle really seems to have done the trick:
http://www.astrobin.com/189261/C/
Although the HII regions throughout the SMC are more subtle, at least the colour is better balanced. Definitely one to revisit and go a bit deeper on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex View Post
Nice one Andy. That Camera does a fairly decent job indeed.
Thanks Rex - a keeper, this one! It will have to be - I'm not allowed spend any more money on astronomical equipment until the kids have finished school, the house paid off, etc etc...
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (smc_small.jpg)
203.2 KB9 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement