Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-05-2015, 06:31 AM
nandopg's Avatar
nandopg
Registered User

nandopg is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Santa Rita do Sapucai - Brazil
Posts: 303
First Lights of my Newt Quattro CF 10" f/4

Dear friends,
Yesterday I took one frame of 10 minutes using a Ha filter (6nm) because of the proximity of the Moon, of the bug nebula.
The camera was a SX-694 and the scope, as mentioned before, a Skywatcher Newtonian Quattro, in Carbon Fiber, 10" f/4.
This version is cropped and reduced to be uploaded here.

My question for you is this: by looking at this image, the result is something that you guys would expect, or there are much room for improvment ?

Thank you for any comment,
Fernando
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Bug_01Frame_Cropped_Reduced.jpg)
180.9 KB126 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2015, 07:19 AM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
The shot looks slightly out of focus to me and pretty noisy for a camera with that cooling potential. I think more shorter subs would be a good idea to start. I'd try five minutes, and stack at least ten with corresponding darks. Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2015, 07:43 AM
nandopg's Avatar
nandopg
Registered User

nandopg is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Santa Rita do Sapucai - Brazil
Posts: 303
Glen,
Oh yes, you are right, but this is just an extreme test to check on performance, not a real finished imaged. Any way, thanks for your comment,

Fernando
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2015, 12:06 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
woohoo. What a great first image Fernando - you must be very pleased.

The resolution is excellent and detail is exceptional for something so small. The stars look a little out of shape, but nothing too bad - maybe a slight tweak on collimation would be a good idea?

Overall though, very nice. Regards Ray

edit: just a tip - watch out for dew inside the OTA tube - the paint runs if it gets wet (or at least mine did).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-05-2015, 02:13 PM
nandopg's Avatar
nandopg
Registered User

nandopg is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Santa Rita do Sapucai - Brazil
Posts: 303
Hi Ray,
Thank you very much for yor feedback. As for the collimation, I have not retuned it after to connect the coma corrector in the optical train. Do you think I should do that ? Just secundary mirror or both ?
Thanks again Ray,
Fernando
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-05-2015, 07:55 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by nandopg View Post
Hi Ray,
Thank you very much for yor feedback. As for the collimation, I have not retuned it after to connect the coma corrector in the optical train. Do you think I should do that ? Just secundary mirror or both ?
Thanks again Ray,
Fernando
Hi Fernando. FWIW, I found that collimating with the coma corrector in place was best and that both mirrors needed to be adjusted. The other thing I found that helped was to round off the ends of the 3 secondary adjusting screws. Mine had sharp raised ends that cut into the surface of the hub and made fine rotation difficult - it is easier with the ends of the screws smoothed off.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-05-2015, 07:59 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
Hi Fernando. FWIW, I found that collimating with the coma corrector in place was best and that both mirrors needed to be adjusted. The other thing I found that helped was to round off the ends of the 3 secondary adjusting screws. Mine had sharp raised ends that cut into the surface of the hub and made fine rotation difficult - it is easier with the ends of the screws smoothed off.
If you use a piece of a plastic milk bottle as a washer between the secondary holder back face and the threes screws you'll get a smoother motion as well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-05-2015, 11:33 PM
nandopg's Avatar
nandopg
Registered User

nandopg is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Santa Rita do Sapucai - Brazil
Posts: 303
Ray,
Thank you so much for the valuable inputs.
If I am not abusing I would have one more question: once the coma corrector is in place and threaded to the CCD, I can understand the collimation of the secundary, as I have the feedback provided by the defocused star on the computer's screen, but the primary, what would be the feedback ? Should I, by the chance, displace a collimated star in the center to the corners to check if the colimation remains at the 4 corners ?

Thanks again Ray

Marc:
Great suggestion, I will implement it.
Thank you very much,
Fernando
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-05-2015, 12:42 PM
Amaranthus's Avatar
Amaranthus (Barry)
Thylacinus stargazoculus

Amaranthus is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Judbury, Tasmania
Posts: 1,203
Good work Fernando. I've recently picked up one of these too, and will also use it with an ICX-694 sensor (QHY22). But due to weather, and observatory construction underway, it's not yet seen first light! A few months for me...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement