Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-05-2015, 06:19 PM
mtodman's Avatar
mtodman (Matt)
Registered User

mtodman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arcadia, NSW, Australia
Posts: 191
Can spherical aberation be caused by incorrect corrector placement

Hi all.
I have previously "upgraded" my C11 OTA by installing ventilation fans, mirror lock & flocking. This process required me to remove the primary mirror as well as the corrector plate / secondary. When I put everything back together, I did my best to ensure that the corrector plate was positioned as close as possible to its original position.
I recently performed a star test which seems to indicate that I'm suffering from spherical aberration (clear diffraction rings on one side of focus but blurred on the other). I have captured this in the following link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmFUJRro8DE

My question is, could this spherical aberration be caused by a slightly incorrect placement of the corrector plate?

Any other ideas as to what could cause this?

Cheers

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2015, 08:23 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
TBH your airy disc looks just fine. Spherical aberration would be caused by focusing on an artificial star too close to the scope so the distance between the secondary and the primary would be wrong. If your corrector was off your star test would look a lot worse so you're ok.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2015, 08:39 PM
mtodman's Avatar
mtodman (Matt)
Registered User

mtodman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arcadia, NSW, Australia
Posts: 191
Thanks Marc.
So are you saying that the star test is not showing serious spherical aberration?
This star test was performed on Hadar. I have a Moonlite motorised focuser hanging of the back of the OTA which would effect the distance between the primary & secondary. Could this contribute to SA?

Cheers

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2015, 10:20 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
looks OK to me as well - small amount of SA, but still pretty good. The star test is quite brutal and can expose aberration that has no practical effect.

I would guess that it works very well when focused - looks like you have a good scope.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-05-2015, 10:47 PM
DarkArts
Registered User

DarkArts is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 672
Looks fairly normal to me. I'd say it's a good scope.

With an offset corrector, you get what looks more like permanent astigmatism rather than spherical aberration.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-05-2015, 08:43 AM
mtodman's Avatar
mtodman (Matt)
Registered User

mtodman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arcadia, NSW, Australia
Posts: 191
Thanks very much for the replies.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-05-2015, 09:53 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtodman View Post
Thanks Marc.
So are you saying that the star test is not showing serious spherical aberration?
This star test was performed on Hadar. I have a Moonlite motorised focuser hanging of the back of the OTA which would effect the distance between the primary & secondary. Could this contribute to SA?

Cheers

Matt
Yes. The airy disc intra/extra focal looks fine and typical of a good SCT.

There is a sweet spot for the distance between the secondary and the primary. Ideally the scope should be focused by moving the camera/eye piece at the back with the distance in between the mirrors being fixed.

In practice you move the primary up and down the baffle and that changes the back focus. I have the measurement somewhere. I'll post them when I find them. Top of my head 46cm approx. between mirrors for the C11.

PS: found it. This is for a standard C11, not EDGE. I'd assume it's still valid.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (C11_specs.png)
24.4 KB20 views

Last edited by multiweb; 03-05-2015 at 10:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-05-2015, 10:36 AM
mtodman's Avatar
mtodman (Matt)
Registered User

mtodman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arcadia, NSW, Australia
Posts: 191
Great. Thanks Marc.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement