Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-04-2015, 06:33 AM
jsmoraes's Avatar
jsmoraes (Jorge)
Registered User

jsmoraes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saquarema, RJ , Brazil
Posts: 1,102
First good test with Focal Extender ES

Full Moon, but the sky was very clean.
Total frames for each AVI : 800 frames
Total used frames:200 frames

GSO 305 mm - ASI120MC - AS!2 - Wavelets Registax 6.0 - PS CS3 for 3 first images.

forth image: GSO 305 mm - ASI120MC + Barlow GSO ED 2x mode 1.5x - AS!2 - Wavelets Registax 6.0 - PS CS3

Last image:
It is hard compare images because there are difference of processing.I did only to have an idea about the possibility and performance of using Focal Expander ES 3x 1.25" and Barlow GSO ED 2x mode 1.5x 2".

Note: I have a doubt about the information in status bar of ASI120MC and SharpCap when capturing images:

1) it show two information: captured frames and dropped frames . What is the difference ? Why there are difference in amount of frames ?

2) manipulation of percentual of USB connection make change in the amount of capatured frames and dropped frames. Better set make dropped frames higher than captured frames. Why ?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jup-19_05_01_link.jpg)
48.2 KB26 views
Click for full-size image (jup-19_19_22_lnk.jpg)
49.4 KB21 views
Click for full-size image (jup-19_21_01_lnk.jpg)
54.4 KB16 views
Click for full-size image (jupusb70-19_56_lnk.jpg)
48.9 KB38 views
Click for full-size image (Jup-compareFExBarlow.jpg)
84.9 KB24 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement