Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > DIY Observatories
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Poll: Best base for a backyard observatory
Poll Options
Best base for a backyard observatory

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
  #1  
Old 24-07-2010, 08:19 PM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
Best base for a back yard observatory

Probably been done before.

Quite a few ICE members have home observatories of various types , so they will know the pros and cons of different observatory constructions and types , or at least their own from experience with it.

I am getting close to being ready to building my own observatory , so here we go.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-07-2010, 08:58 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,366
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ht=Observatory i am sure your answer is in there
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-07-2010, 09:00 PM
mldee's Avatar
mldee (Mike)
Photon sorter

mldee is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Near Warwick, Qld, Australia
Posts: 657
Best is not the same as most cost-effective (Budget and SHMBO constraints may vary). Mine is timber base, due to budget. A slab would be far better, but beyond my DIY capabilities and budget. YMMV.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-07-2010, 09:13 PM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
Thanks for that mate, I do remember that thread.

I'm leaning towards concrete but the price of slab is not nice. I'll still have to put decent concrete footings in for my steel pier no matter what.
May not be that much extra to lay a mechanically isolated slab about the footing at the same time - I've never done any concreting myself and don't have the gear for it so I'll have to get a concreter to do that for me.
An off ground platform may not be that much cheaper than a slab and my carpentry skill may not be up to it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-07-2010, 09:24 PM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by mldee View Post
Best is not the same as most cost-effective (Budget and SHMBO constraints may vary). Mine is timber base, due to budget. A slab would be far better, but beyond my DIY capabilities and budget. YMMV.
How big is your base and how much (there abouts) did it cost you to do it ?

I'd like mine about 3.2m x 3.6m.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-07-2010, 10:18 PM
SkyViking's Avatar
SkyViking (Rolf)
Registered User

SkyViking is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waitakere Ranges, New Zealand
Posts: 2,260
I made an off the ground timber base on 6 posts for my first obs. Cost was around $100 all up for the base.
I can imagine concrete would be better, but the timber base was very easy to do.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-07-2010, 07:38 PM
AstroJunk's Avatar
AstroJunk (Jonathan)
Shadow Chaser

AstroJunk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moonee Beach
Posts: 1,940
My slab was $300 for the concrete (half of that was the delivery charge) and about $50 for the reo. Easy, cheap and solid as. Wouldn't have it any other way!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-07-2010, 10:16 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
That poll is confusing, a simple monolithic concrete slab with bolts set in it to take the pier (reo?, your kidding, why?) and an isolated Obs timber floor hovering above it is the simplest and easiest DIY, no subbies required, how hard is it to pour concrete into a hole and set bolts into it, sheesh?.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-07-2010, 12:24 PM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
I voted other because you don't specify what equipment or purpose you have. An isolated pier on a big block of concrete is the best mount option in any scenario but after that the rest is price and comfort.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26-07-2010, 02:35 PM
mldee's Avatar
mldee (Mike)
Photon sorter

mldee is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Near Warwick, Qld, Australia
Posts: 657
Sorry for the tardy reply. My obs is only 2.2x2.2m square with a treated pine pole at each corner, plus two more out the back to hold the wooden RO rails. I suspended the wood floor on pine joists attached to the poles, independant of the colourbond wall sheeting.

In retrospect, 2.2 is a bit too small, (it was more or less dictated by the dimensions of sheeting and my budget) and would be unsuitable for anything longer than a 1200mm newt. However, as I now do all my observing remotely from inside the adjacent house, the small size is not a problem.

My estimate of floor costs would be 2 x 2400 sheets of thick ply, plus about 6 treated pine 40x70? joists. It works well, but flexes slightly and creaks a bit, due to insufficient supports below the joists. (I'm a rotten carpenter, and built it all myself). But it works, carpeted, keeps the rain off, and I would estimate the total obs cost as $750 or so, including DIY bagged cement for the post ~50cm deep corner pole foundations and the 50x50x1m cement base for the I beam pier. Pier was a freebie from a friend and works well.

RO Roof is wood frame with polycarbonate sheet for daylighting, with judicious sarking to stop condensation and heat. Pics show.

Berry amachoor, but a solo job and I'm no spring chicken. It works just great in Brisbane west's rather benign climate. Will never win a spot in Grand Designs, though

Few pics attached. Cheers,
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (obs prep 1.jpg)
187.3 KB312 views
Click for full-size image (Floor Joists 2.jpg)
113.8 KB319 views
Click for full-size image (obs external 1.jpg)
143.9 KB297 views
Click for full-size image (obs external 3.jpg)
159.7 KB296 views
Click for full-size image (As built internal.jpg)
125.7 KB348 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 26-07-2010, 05:05 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Any observatory should have the minimum of thermal mass that can hold heat.
A large concrete slab is the worst option for a floor. It will equilibrate by dawn if you are lucky. This of course depends on climate.

I have a wood deck with gaps between the jarra slats. That way cool air comes from the ground and keeps the whole observatory about 7C below ambient during the day even in summer and full Sun!. It has a well insulated roof and IR reflecting paint on the outside.

At night with the ROR open it cools down to ambient in less than 30 minutes.

bert
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 26-07-2010, 08:38 PM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff
Starry Eyed

Jeff is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wonga Park
Posts: 692
Hi Ian,

I originally planned to lay a 100mm concrete slab (2.5m x 2.5m).

However, after clearing/leveling an area of back lawn for a slab and casting a concrete pier (approx 1m deep and 30mm diam with 1/2" stainless threaded rods inserted), I changed my mind.

I elected to place the floor (frame of treated hardwood joists covered by yellow-tongue board) directly on the dirt.

Perfectly stable, and easy to shift when we eventually shift house in a few years.

Good luck with your project.

Cheers,
Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 26-07-2010, 10:28 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,766
Agreed Bert first put in the pier, with footings, then surround with an elevated floor, that was mine as well.

Well it is still here, but empty, H took it all. Yea but he is still cool

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 26-07-2010, 10:34 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,766
Fred you have confused me as well, with you response.

Please explain.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27-07-2010, 03:22 PM
higginsdj's Avatar
higginsdj
A Lazy Astronomer

higginsdj is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 614
I prefer a simpler solution and it has worked for me for the past decade. I use the tripod that came with my Meade 14". I have small peirs dug into the ground for each foot of the tripod. The observatory floor is wood and isolated from the piers. The piers comprise stacked 8" sqare cement tiles stacked like bricks with motar between them. The extend into the ground 12"-18". As long as you have a stable tripod (the meade supergiant tripod is very stable) then this solution works and is far, far, far cheaper than a pier.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 27-07-2010, 03:37 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,766
Nice one higginsdj, and thinking about it, yep that would do the trick, as long as it is stable, go for it, and as you said, much cheaper, well done indeed.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 19-08-2010, 08:32 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Fred you have confused me as well, with you response.

Please explain.

Leon
Poll includes several symultaneous solutions, not seperate ones
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 21-08-2010, 11:27 AM
Barrykgerdes
Registered User

Barrykgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
The best base for an observatory depends on how much you need to spend to achieve your aim.

I built mine over a couple of weekends on a 2.3 metre by about 110mm thick reinforced concrete slab laid by my neighbour, a conctrete contractor fo $180. The rest of the the observatory was completed with the total cost under $4000 including the fibre glass dome.

For full details and general costing see
http://sarcasmogerdes.dyndns.org/obs...s/obsvatry.doc

I was only interested in a home for my 10" LX200, later 12" LX200 but it was polar aligned on a wedge accurately and was available 24hrs a day for observations.

If you are more interested in long exposure photography you will need better insulation and temperature control and a solid stable pier. The cost from here could be exponential.

Barry
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 21-08-2010, 09:15 PM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,804
Just a side thought/note. If you elect to lay a slab down as the base then you dont need a pier footing. You can simply lay concrete blocks on the slab (tied in with dyna bolts or cast in at time of pouring slab). Then you simply fill in the blocks with 15mpa block fill and can even cast the pier plate bolts in! This will help any differntial movement that subterranean footings can suffer with. It can also help with getting the correct height of your pier as you can elect to lay as many or few blocks as you require.

I did this as my pier was palced on an existing slab.

Note/Disclaimer: You should check the coeficient of linear expansion (temperature dependant) to ensure that the slab you lay (primarily surface dimension) has sufficent mass to a) support the above ground footing, and b) be of the same material to exapnd and contract in union.

Last edited by CoolhandJo; 21-08-2010 at 09:26 PM. Reason: added CLE explaination
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 24-08-2010, 04:55 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,165
This may be staledated but here is my response.

I have built 3 observatories to date. The first was a converted garden shed at home on a very thick 1 piece concrete floor. That worked fine.

Another was out in the country and that was an 8 inch steel tube, 5/6mm thick and 1.8 metres long set in a hole 800mm deep in the ground and set with rapid set concrete. Then pavers around the rest of the floor.

Worked fine and was easy to build.

The last was more sophisticated, a pier 800 x 800 x 800 deep. A 2nd slab 2m x 2m sitting on ground with building plastic and steel reo.

Then gravelly roadbase then finer paving roadbase and large pavers with a small gap at the slabs. Works fine, easy to lay looks good and is easy to maintain. No vibration issues.

The structure around it is not in contact with the floor so no wind induced vibrations.

I had read stories of one slab observatories where merely walking on the slab caused vibrations that wrecked images.

Frame is treated pine and L brackets and roofing screws. Cladding is Aircell insulbreak everywhere and colorbond Trimdek. Roof rolls off on 2 100x 50 x 4mm steel section and 8 wheels on top of the frame. Several trusses and light metal roof battens with the Insulbreak underneath.

Before summer I intend to install a solar powered fan to circulate air and maybe a whirlybird on the roof.

You need insulation and air circulation as you don't want your gear to fry in summer but you want rapid cooldown at nights.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement