Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-09-2006, 08:49 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
one supernova is just too damn bright!

This one has cosmologists and astrophysicists scratching their heads. A supernova more than twice as bright as it has been thought possible. The implications could be as far reaching as the Big Bang itself.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems...9/s1745836.htm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-09-2006, 09:23 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I wonder if twice as bright means twice the energy release?
If one has been found like this is is difficult to imagine it will be the only one like this. If twice the power I wonder if this may help finding a "gravity wave" in the energy outflow. I guess they would need one closer.
I also wonder if there is any way the data could be misinterpretted because as you say if the finding is as they believe the math needs revision as to the limit.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-09-2006, 09:44 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Yes, I think it would imply twice the energy.

I heard a lengthier report on the BBC (rebroadcast on ABC Newsradio), which mentioned the possibility of a coincidence of a double star system where both stars end up as supernovae at around the same time IIRC (but I prolly don't). Here is more at the BBC:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5367540.stm
- a bit over-sensationalised ("breaks laws of physics" type of talk is nonsense) but informative nonetheless.

And in Nature. (visit your local library if you are having hassles about subscription when trying to read article)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-09-2006, 09:57 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Thanks for that. Actually I am noticing many scientific matters are being presented in a sentationalised manner, take how the "Cosmological constant" has been dealt with by many over the last 12 months for example... but yes information nevertheless.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2006, 07:15 PM
mattweather
Registered User

mattweather is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ballina, Australia
Posts: 156
Maybe next one would seen from our sky!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement