Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Yeah, nice work  ...dunno which I prefer though as I do like the bold star field  ...but both are good.
|
Thanks mate. Personal taste, I suppose. Must admit, at web viewing scales I like the reduced star version. But at 100% I just noticed it's a bit ugly with artefacts from the star reduction and the original is better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS
I'm undecided as well, Troy. Is there a bigger version somewhere?
|
Here's some 1920px versions, and a mosaic of the corners, edges and middle using the PI script AberrationInspector:
Original:
1920px,
corners at 100%
Reduced stars:
1920px,
corners at 100%.
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
I like the one with less stars.
|
Thanks mate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nebulosity.
Very nice
Jo
|
Thankyou.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dutch2
They're both great images, well done.

|
Cheers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulus
Nicely done Troy. I like them.
|
Thankyou.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod771
Gee that's effective, but I prefer the second one. That's just me though, they're both very good! 
|
Sure is, hey. I hadn't thought about it til I attempted these - that reducing the stars makes such a difference in making the nebulosity and dust more visible.