Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-07-2014, 06:40 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Help me with this FSQ problem please

I have bought a 106 FSQED. I also got the reducer QE to go with it.

Now I plan to use the QSI683WSG8 as my imaging camera.

I want to use the reducer and my Optec 2" rotator together.

Now the reducer has a back focus of 72.2mm which means I cannot put the rotator in between the reducer and camera (the back focus of the camera is 54mm with Astrodon filters).

So this means that if I want to use the rotator I have put it into the space between the focusor and the reducer. The rotator is 41mm thick.

My question is: Is this actually possible? Anyone have any idea what the focus point distance is from the focusor racked right out.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-07-2014, 08:09 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,389
Does this help Paul?

http://www.buytelescopes.com/t/TakahashiBackFocus
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-07-2014, 11:34 PM
Exfso's Avatar
Exfso (Peter)
Registered User

Exfso is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,699
Why not contact Fred at TNR, he would have all the answers you need Paul. You might put this question to the Uncensored tak group. The guys from TNR monitor all the questions put up there.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-07-2014, 09:27 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exfso View Post
Why not contact Fred at TNR, he would have all the answers you need Paul. You might put this question to the Uncensored tak group. The guys from TNR monitor all the questions put up there.
Good idea Pete. Though from talking to Wysi last night he reckons I just should not use the reducer at all and just go with the native focal length and get one adapter made up from the focusor to the rotator. Sounds like a plan to me. If I want a wider field of view then I will need a larger sensor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
That gives me the info but typically for Tak there is no diagram for where the back focus begins on the scope itself. That info would be more helpful. Thanks for that all the same.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-07-2014, 02:15 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
Good idea Pete. Though from talking to Wysi last night he reckons I just should not use the reducer at all and just go with the native focal length and get one adapter made up from the focusor to the rotator. Sounds like a plan to me. If I want a wider field of view then I will need a larger sensor.



That gives me the info but typically for Tak there is no diagram for where the back focus begins on the scope itself. That info would be more helpful. Thanks for that all the same.
Paul, I think you have made the right choice.
With my BabyQ, with a native 200mm of back focus, I had more room to play than a 106ED with only 178mm. But even so, was barely able to get my reducer into the imaging train. I used a FLI PDF focuser as well as FW and OAG so I had to remove the Captains Wheel rotator and rack the scope's focuser within a few mm of right in to get these things in. Your AO at 40 plus mm sounds to me like it would be a non-starter.
Peter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-08-2014, 09:25 AM
Earl_UK (Earl)
Registered User

Earl_UK is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Ledbury
Posts: 1
With the Reducer it wont work there is not enough backfocus left for it to fit, which is a pain, I like mine been reduced but at the sacrifice of no rotator.

If there was a way to get a rotator to fit inbetween the reducer and QSI that would be awesome. but its not out there at present.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement