Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-08-2014, 05:18 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
First light for FSQ106

A month ago I bought a replacement for the TSA102. I spent over a year looking around for the new scope that I wanted. I looked at scopes with much larger aperture and with faster ratios, but in the end I went with a reliable performer; a Takahashi FSQ. It gives a slightly wider field of view from the TSA with a reducer on and is certainly a little faster photographically.

I thought I would start with Corona Australis first. I will need to take some shorter subs to control the globular cluster. This image is 270 minutes in Lum.

Click here for higher resolution image.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Sum NGC6729 scaled 270 Lum cs.jpg)
151.2 KB125 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2014, 05:32 PM
Rac's Avatar
Rac (Raymond)
Registered User

Rac is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Whangarei, New Zealand
Posts: 120
That looks really nice and smooth!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-08-2014, 06:13 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Real nice field. That's what I should get with the QHY9. Some stars seem to have small diffraction spikes. What's that? Camera bloom?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-08-2014, 06:15 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
I like this region. Unfortunately my LP prevents me from going deep in OSC.

Will you be adding RGB data to this one?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-08-2014, 06:24 PM
DaveNZ's Avatar
DaveNZ (Dave)
Registered User

DaveNZ is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Dunedin, NZ
Posts: 217
Nice image Paul. That Tak. Sounds impressive. Sometimes I think I should have gone with high quality refractor than a fast Newtonian.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-08-2014, 06:32 PM
Leonardo70's Avatar
Leonardo70 (Leonardo Orazi)
Registered User

Leonardo70 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Italy - Turin
Posts: 771
Congrats Paul.

All the best,
Leo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-08-2014, 07:54 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
A great start, Paul. Look forward to what you can do with the Tak!

Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Real nice field. That's what I should get with the QHY9. Some stars seem to have small diffraction spikes. What's that? Camera bloom?
I think it's the KAF-8300 microlenses that does that. I see it with My FSQ-106ED and SX H-18 camera.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-08-2014, 07:58 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
I think it's the KAF-8300 microlenses that does that. I see it with My FSQ-106ED and SX H-18 camera.
Ha ok, no worries.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-08-2014, 07:58 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Thanks guys for the comments.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
A great start, Paul. Look forward to what you can do with the Tak!



I think it's the KAF-8300 microlenses that does that. I see it with My FSQ-106ED and SX H-18 camera.
Marc and Rick. It is the microlensing according to what I have been told. It does not bother me though. Kind of memory lane stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-08-2014, 08:16 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Nice work Paul. Are you thinking of getting a reducer for it too?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-08-2014, 08:30 PM
DJT (David)
Registered User

DJT is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,459
Nice first light Paul. Enjoy!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-08-2014, 08:52 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
I like this region. Unfortunately my LP prevents me from going deep in OSC.

Will you be adding RGB data to this one?
Yes Kevin I will be adding colour data when the moon cycle is right. At present I am just picking up a few subs each clear night after the moon sets.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-08-2014, 09:03 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF View Post
Nice work Paul. Are you thinking of getting a reducer for it too?
I have one Rob, but I cannot use a rotator with the reducer in place. If I could use a reducer I would have a similar field of view to that of an FSQ with an STXL11002. unfortunately the back focus on the reducer is only 78mm which does not leave enough room for a rotator. If I don't have a rotator if makes it difficult for remote imaging. Not impossible, but difficult. It limits what sort of composition you will have to any one object. I often at present just take a single shot and then rotate the camera to get the composition I like. If I could get a narrower one than the Optec 2" one I have I would buy one for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-08-2014, 09:50 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Paul,

Looking great so far. I'm also capturing the same region. Have several hours of data now.

You can use a TAKometer from Astrodon as your rotator. Takes next to no back focus.

I'm just waiting on my old man to send mine up from Sydney (I left a lot of stuff behind when I moved up north) and I look forward to installing it.

H
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-08-2014, 10:22 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
Paul,

Looking great so far. I'm also capturing the same region. Have several hours of data now.

You can use a TAKometer from Astrodon as your rotator. Takes next to no back focus.

I'm just waiting on my old man to send mine up from Sydney (I left a lot of stuff behind when I moved up north) and I look forward to installing it.

H

So with the CAA with takometer (god that costs a fortune) on and the reducer off that onto the camera, that would work??
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-08-2014, 11:27 PM
Leonardo70's Avatar
Leonardo70 (Leonardo Orazi)
Registered User

Leonardo70 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Italy - Turin
Posts: 771
The metal backfocus of standard reducer is 72.2mm and remember to calculate the extra coming form a filters tickness.

An exposure of 30min with 8300 is a light bomb ... you need a superdark sky to avoid gradient.. but probably you have this.

Again congrats Paul...

All the best,
Leo
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-08-2014, 08:21 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonardo70 View Post
The metal backfocus of standard reducer is 72.2mm and remember to calculate the extra coming form a filters tickness.

An exposure of 30min with 8300 is a light bomb ... you need a superdark sky to avoid gradient.. but probably you have this.

Again congrats Paul...

All the best,
Leo

Thanks for the correction Leonardo regarding the metal back distance. My filters give me another mm to work with. That said for now I am not going to be buying the CAA and a Takometer.

1 hour out of Adelaide generally is a quite dark sky. So 30 minute subs are ok. Most nights we get around 21.6 on an SQM. There is some slight light pollution to the north west of my position but I don't image in that area much.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-08-2014, 08:28 AM
Rigel003's Avatar
Rigel003 (Graeme)
Registered User

Rigel003 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,082
Very nice, Paul. The FSQ will be a good complement to your 12" and add some extra reach at the wide field end.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-08-2014, 04:10 PM
Rac's Avatar
Rac (Raymond)
Registered User

Rac is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Whangarei, New Zealand
Posts: 120
Far out i don't see how the TAKometer should cost that much! A stepper motor, mount, belt and and someone who can write you some code for an arduino is all you would need.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement