Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-06-2014, 09:24 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Crop or flatten?

Anyone found an effective flattener for the GSO 8" RC's?

Or simpler/more cost effective to crop the image?

Also, anyone tried the new focal reducer GSO made for these?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-06-2014, 09:49 AM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 973
The 4000 chip is smaller than APS-C - you might not need a flattener. From Paul's thread it seems like he only needs a flattener for the corners of his images and he is using a full frame sensor (an SBIG 11000).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-06-2014, 10:34 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Seems we might get a crack at testing it all tonight. Technically it's not mine (YET), as I bought it on behalf of a mate with the proviso I showed him how to use it etc (bad choice of teacher...).

I have made him an offer with something else he might like instead...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-06-2014, 12:38 PM
DJT (David)
Registered User

DJT is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,459
Hi Lewis, I picked up a ts flattener spruiked as working well with the RC8. Got the adapters made up for the moonlite and the STL

Chucked it on and indeed flat to the edges but reflections and the introduced hotspot was quite something. Have set it aside for now and am happy to crop till I figure out what to do with the flattener. The RC8 with my chip means I just crop 20% which is fine for what I want to image.

Will look at maybe flocking for the flattener and adapters at some point but no rush. With hindsight, the extra glass is just another point of failure at the moment and I can get away without it
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-06-2014, 01:11 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Thanks David.

First thing we did was matt-down the focuser/drawtube spacers with some ultra-flat black paint. These looked suspiciously shiny, despite the grooving/mini baffles.

The intention is almost solely galactic imagery with this one, so definitely not wanting a reducer, but after the test tonight, will decide if it needs any sort of field flattener. The CCDInspector result Lars provided showed around 30% curvature, though almost all of it at the periphery of the mirror. The central area looks nice, and it certainly is beautifully collimated (survived the road trip very well, thanks to Lars supreme packaging). Lars had tried a Tak flattener in it, to minimal effect.

The 4000 chip gives me a little hope for being outside the curve, as Richard suggests. I know my sadly departed ST8XE would have had no issue, with that tiny chip
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-06-2014, 03:48 PM
ReaPerMan's Avatar
ReaPerMan (Paul)
Work & Play at Night

ReaPerMan is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 677
Hi Lewis, I had success with the Astrotec 2" FF. This worked on my QHY10.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-06-2014, 09:28 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,989
Tak flattener 35 works well with that scope. Produces a flat field to the edges of an APS size sensor.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement