Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-05-2014, 09:17 AM
Pinwheel's Avatar
Pinwheel (Doug)
Registered User

Pinwheel is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wimmera victoria
Posts: 512
Virgo Cluster

I saw the Virgo cluster of galaxies last night but can't photograph it as my 12" dob is an F5. As you astro photographers are so good at this, how about posting some photos of it. I'd love to see the Virgo cluster in more detail.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-05-2014, 09:29 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
What do you have against F5?

How about Jo's excellent M86 and surrounding area? http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=119778

Or http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=119997
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-05-2014, 09:44 AM
Pinwheel's Avatar
Pinwheel (Doug)
Registered User

Pinwheel is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wimmera victoria
Posts: 512
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
What do you have against F5?
Nothing. My F5 has no back focus & to get it, I need to cut 50mm off the tube. I'm not ready to cut up my new 12" just yet also my scope is a Dob without any tracking.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-05-2014, 11:42 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
The f/5 statement could be misleading to newbies Doug. The f number is irrelevant; it's just the construction. My f/5 has enough back focus.
I understand your frustration from earlier posts in other threads, and sympathise with you. I don't recall how much more back focus you need,
would a low profile focuser not be enough? Whoops, sorry, gone off subject.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-05-2014, 12:40 PM
Pinwheel's Avatar
Pinwheel (Doug)
Registered User

Pinwheel is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wimmera victoria
Posts: 512
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
The f/5 statement could be misleading to newbies Doug. The f number is irrelevant; it's just the construction. My f/5 has enough back focus.
I understand your frustration from earlier posts in other threads, and sympathise with you. I don't recall how much more back focus you need,
would a low profile focuser not be enough? Whoops, sorry, gone off subject.
raymo
Good point, I'm guesstimating 25-35mm so. Just for interest, can you measure how long your F5's tube length is.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-05-2014, 02:02 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
The Baader MKIII coma corrector will also buy you a few mm of inside focus and you will need one anyway for prime focus.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-05-2014, 02:51 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
My 8" f/5 OTA is 910mm overall. Using the same construction
dimensions scaled up the 12" would be approx. 1355mm. I
imagine a low profile focuser would gain you at least 30mm,
maybe a little more; combined with the aforementioned coma
corrector you might make it. There are often ways of moving the mirror
up the tube without chopping the end off, depending upon the
type of mirror cell, and how it is installed.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22-05-2014, 03:31 PM
Pinwheel's Avatar
Pinwheel (Doug)
Registered User

Pinwheel is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wimmera victoria
Posts: 512
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
My 8" f/5 OTA is 910mm overall. Using the same construction dimensions scaled up the 12" would be approx. 1355mm.
Well that works out perfectly, my tube is 1405mm so take off 50mm would make it 1355mm too! Now you've got me thinking should I cut it back...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22-05-2014, 05:21 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinwheel View Post
Well that works out perfectly, my tube is 1405mm so take off 50mm would make it 1355mm too! Now you've got me thinking should I cut it back...
Before you start cutting... Do you have a tracking mount for the big dob? Without it you could do planetary but not galaxies.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 22-05-2014, 06:04 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
As I said, why not look into moving the mirror up inside the tube, rather than chopping it off. Maybe make some 50mm spacers to go between the end of the tube and the cell. I don't know how the GSO is constructed.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-05-2014, 07:46 AM
Pinwheel's Avatar
Pinwheel (Doug)
Registered User

Pinwheel is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wimmera victoria
Posts: 512
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
As I said, why not look into moving the mirror up inside the tube, rather than chopping it off. Maybe make some 50mm spacers to go between the end of the tube and the cell. I don't know how the GSO is constructed.
raymo
Actually I'm investigating this option first. I have an idea for a 50mm x 300mm circular plastic or aluminum honeycomb spacer to fit under the mirror. Then it's just a matter of getting 6 bolts 50mm longer to secure the mirror to the assembly.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement