Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-07-2006, 07:04 PM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
NGC55 Galaxy in Scupltor from last night

Hi Gang,

I feel asleep middle of the way and took 44 x 84 second exposure at it autoguided. Was planning to only take 15-20

Comments welcome.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC55_44x84b_final_tag.JPG)
53.4 KB61 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-07-2006, 07:10 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Lovely pic showing some nice dark lane detail in the galaxy.
Well done
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-07-2006, 07:45 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Hi Eric,

tracking is spot on there. That is a big galaxy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-07-2006, 08:00 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Well done Eric...yep tracking looks good.

You can never take too many exposures...always strive for more exposures then not enough.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-07-2006, 10:16 PM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
Many thanks for comments guys. appreciated. Was hard to find a guidestar esp with a 4" newt as a guidescope.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-07-2006, 10:36 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
you should fall asleep more often!

lots of detail there

but if your tracking is this good why stop at 84 seconds? why not go up to to 2 or even 5 minutes????
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-07-2006, 12:24 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
thanks seeker i needed the sleep. Currently just testing the autoguiding so i sticked to my 84sec just incase. Also, if there are frames that need to be discarded due to cloud coverings, tracking error, pec etc, i will feel better discarding a 84 sec frame than a 5 minute frame
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-07-2006, 07:21 AM
Itchy's Avatar
Itchy
still trying

Itchy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hunter Valley
Posts: 513
Eric,
Yea, longer subs would help. This is actually a tough galaxy to image (aren't they all ).

A nice image, though it could have been frammed a little better.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-07-2006, 07:43 AM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
Cheers Tony. Thanks for the feedback. what is subs? as in exposure?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-07-2006, 10:48 PM
Itchy's Avatar
Itchy
still trying

Itchy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hunter Valley
Posts: 513
Quote:
Originally Posted by EzyStyles
Cheers Tony. Thanks for the feedback. what is subs? as in exposure?
Yes, sub exposures make up the stack.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement