Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > ATM and DIY Projects
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 09-02-2014, 05:14 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
GSO 12" A better secondary spider

I did this changeover quite a while back but here is a write up
on it:

The standard GSO secondary spider vane assembly comes with quite chunky vanes, they measure 0.8mm / about 30thou.
This shows in images as quite imposing diffraction spikes.
Made worse because they are not really mounted that symmetrically to the centre hub. See pics 1 and 2.

I decided to change them out to thinner vanes and also turn up a better hub in the lathe. ( an old VCR head)
Firstly I used metal packing strip which I measured at 0.5mm/ ~20 thou thickness.

I then decided to go thinner again, this time using feeler strip guages which can be bought in 300mm lengths, similar to these.
These strips are perfectly straight when under tension and harder than mild steel. My current set are 0.25mm / ~10 thou.
I had to cut the holes for the end screw brackets using a Dremel, - mainly to stop distorting them by conventional drilling, and secondly
because even HSS drill bits won't get through them.

As a set, I clamped them, then drilled them as a matched lengths to get as good as I could to
having the secondary mirror right on the central axis of the OTA.

Attaching them to the hub I used the same method that Dad and I used on the 8" homemade scope.
Wrapped around a pin, which then sat in a machined hole close to the edge of the hub.

Pins were a press fit, the whole process done on a vice.

Lastly is a pic showing how fine the diffraction spikes can get on a night of exceptional seeing.
You can see fine adjustment is still needed to make the vanes diametrically opposed to their opponent, 180 degrees opposite.
This is achieved with packers on the offending vane.

What this whole process enables me to do is image very faint detail very close to bright stars. Look at the detail in NGC 2822
which is normally lost in the glare of Miaplacidus.

I must thank my amazing father for this.
It was his idea to use feeler strip, his idea to use dowel pins, possibly his VCR alum stock, he bought me my lathe......
I love you Dad

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (original_1.jpg)
36.4 KB135 views
Click for full-size image (original_2.jpg)
52.9 KB150 views
Click for full-size image (new_1.jpg)
83.7 KB131 views
Click for full-size image (new_2.jpg)
75.0 KB145 views
Click for full-size image (new_3.jpg)
59.5 KB138 views
Click for full-size image (new_4.jpg)
96.2 KB139 views
Click for full-size image (new_5.jpg)
54.9 KB146 views
Click for full-size image (miaplacidus_025vanes.jpg)
69.8 KB165 views

Last edited by kinetic; 09-02-2014 at 06:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2014, 06:01 PM
Mighty_oz (Marcus)
Registered User

Mighty_oz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atm somewhere in Perth
Posts: 575
Looks like a nice piece of work there

" Attaching them to the hub I used the same method that Dad and I used on the 8" homemade scope.
Wrapped around a pin, which then sat in a machined hole close to the edge of the hub. "

Is there much movement at the pin site ? Just curious that's all.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2014, 08:28 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighty_oz View Post

Is there much movement at the pin site ? Just curious that's all.

Mark
None Mark. Pins are snug , press fit with the vice, sized to be tight
enough so the loop won't 'unwrap' itself when the vanes are tensioned.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-02-2014, 06:18 PM
nebulosity.'s Avatar
nebulosity. (Jo)
Registered User

nebulosity. is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cecil Plains QLD
Posts: 1,228
Really nice work, great idea of attaching the spider vanes will keep it in mind for my next secondary build.

Cheers
Jo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2014, 10:20 PM
SkyViking's Avatar
SkyViking (Rolf)
Registered User

SkyViking is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waitakere Ranges, New Zealand
Posts: 2,260
Some great work there Steve! Spider vanes really need to be as thin as possible.
Have you noticed any difference in appearance of the spikes across the frame? Theoretically, as soon as the star is slightly off-axis the vanes would still appear thicker since they'd be viewed from an angle. But I don't know how noticeable the effect is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kinetic View Post
What this whole process enables me to do is image very faint detail very close to bright stars.
That sounds familiar... you'll be switching to guitar strings next!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-02-2014, 11:35 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Hi Rolf,

I hadn't really noticed across the frame differences but to be honest I didn't really
look at it.
Now that you point it out, I always image NGC 2822 with the galaxy itself centred in the shot and Miaplacidus down in the bottom right corner.
As you can see the spikes still look reasonably sharp. Food for thought, maybe on a good,
steady night I should do two sets, the second with Mia centre of frame.

I love your secondary dew experiments, just read it!
I was only thinking last week about your guitar string arrangement and thinking to myself
I wonder if Rolf eve thought of using the strings via some insulators as a way of getting power to the secondary! Then I thought, no, I bet heat would be a problem! Funny stuff!

I did try 4 thou feeler but it was too thin even under tension, showed flex when the OTA was moved from zenith to other orientations, 10 thou/0.25mm seems to be the
compromise.

Great to see amateurs sharing ideas , thumbs up!

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-02-2014, 05:16 AM
Rac's Avatar
Rac (Raymond)
Registered User

Rac is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Whangarei, New Zealand
Posts: 120
I'm currently using .25mm brass shim that's 30mm tall and see no change in spikes from center to edge of frame if i move the same star around and that's with a 10" f4 mirror.

I have thought about going thinner but i think the secondary would need a counter weight out the front.

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5527/1...85c601c7_c.jpg
IMG_9149 by Raymond Collecutt, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-02-2014, 09:23 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
Clever mounting Steve.

@Raymond: terrific pictures on your flickr account. Quite a handy man yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-02-2014, 11:42 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Rolf,
FWIW, I seem to get no noticeable difference in diffraction with a set
centred on NGC2822 and Miaplacidus offset, and a second set centred on
Mia.
See attached.

1st image was 150 frames centred on the galaxy.
2nd set is 65 frames centred on Mia.

Oversharpening applied to both images to emphasise the spikes.
Tonight was a good night to test this, seeing is very steady.

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (16feb_ngc2822.jpg)
139.6 KB54 views
Click for full-size image (16feb_miaplacidus.jpg)
164.3 KB59 views
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-02-2014, 11:47 AM
SkyViking's Avatar
SkyViking (Rolf)
Registered User

SkyViking is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waitakere Ranges, New Zealand
Posts: 2,260
Cheers Steve, that's handy to know. It was purely theoretical, I've never seen the effect documented and your images confirm it to be non-existent or minimal, at least within this FOV. There might still be a difference with a larger chip, but probably nothing much. Thanks for posting the pics.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement