M83 Southern Pinwheel Galaxy with DSI II

[EzyStyles (Eric)]

Hi Guys,

Took M83 without the UHC-S Filter again. This time, it is evident more details compared to the one with the UHC-S Filter and it didnt turned as red

22 x 84 Second Exposure stacked.

Comments welcome good/bad.

cheers.

[h0ughy (David)]

fantastic, goo work Ezy, but tell me this , why 84 seconds each exposure?

[hevelsky]

Wow , Great Image Eric !!!!! Well done

[janoskiss (Steve H)]

Just had a search for your older shots of this with the DSI I. This is so much better it's amazing! Top shot, Eric!

[Lester]

Wow! Eric,

That is really something.

So only use the UHC-S filter on red emission nebula, is that correct?

[xelasnave]

Spot on (and all your recent work really)
alex

[davidpretorius]

i can honestly say I love your shots. Amazing how far you have come in such a short time!!

[EzyStyles (Eric)]

Many thanks for all your kind words guys. I really appreciated it.

Originally Posted by janoskiss

Just had a search for your older shots of this with the DSI I. This is so much better it's amazing! Top shot, Eric!

hehe thanks Steve. Here's my first M83 shot in March this year below. A huge difference. http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...&highlight=m83

[EzyStyles (Eric)]

Originally Posted by Lester

Wow! Eric,

That is really something.

So only use the UHC-S filter on red emission nebula, is that correct?

Thanks Lester. With my setup, it seems the UHC-S filter only helps with red nebulas .

cheers.

[EzyStyles (Eric)]

Originally Posted by h0ughy

fantastic, goo work Ezy, but tell me this , why 84 seconds each exposure?

Ive tried longer eg 2minutes, 2 min 30 sec , can't seem to tell the difference if i stack less.

General rule i have read somewhere 15 x 84 second = 1260 secs is same as 7 x 3 minutes. Might be wrong with this method?

Cheers houghy.