Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-06-2013, 08:14 PM
Stardrifter_WA
Life is looking up!

Stardrifter_WA is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,017
Disturbing News

I found this article a little disturbing, as it may affect our night skies:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-1...-trial/4756480

That's all we need, more junk in space to reflect light at night.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-06-2013, 11:40 AM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
Geez, I read a similar article earlier today but didn't make a connection to astronomy ...
All we need, more high flying junk. They will be trying to block the suns harmfull rays soon with a blanket of balloons.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-06-2013, 12:07 PM
pgc hunter's Avatar
pgc hunter
Registered User

pgc hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Renmark, SA
Posts: 2,993
I really don't see how a balloon 20km up is going to affect our night skies. It will be in the Earth's shadow before twilight even ends and thus be invisible. If anything, existing satellites and aircraft have more of an "impact" on the night sky....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-06-2013, 10:19 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Bugger..


More clutter above, as if satellites weren't enough... These darn things will have solar panels and be just big enough to be seen telescopically, if you are lookig at the right place at the right time. But they'll show up in fairly deep images, producing trails across your image.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-06-2013, 10:15 AM
PeterM
Registered User

PeterM is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,998
And of course when they realize they can use them as advertising sky billboards with super bright LEDs....I can imagine exactly where this could head.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-06-2013, 10:44 AM
inline_online (Dan)
Registered User

inline_online is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Perth
Posts: 167
I'd be more concerned about this...

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-1...k-mofo/4758720
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-06-2013, 10:54 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by inline_online View Post
I'd be more concerned about this...

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-1...k-mofo/4758720
This is independence day kind of stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-06-2013, 01:04 PM
Barrykgerdes
Registered User

Barrykgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
The idea is novel. Its effect on astronomy will be negligable. It is all about putting transponders into low orbits to give internet coverage, and much cheaper than launching satellites.

At 60,000 feet and moving at high speed (air currents) they may appear as streaks on some photograpic exposures but this would only be spasmodic. To have one pass through your specific 1 degree FOV would be quite rare.

However it will probably never eventuate.

Barry
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 18-06-2013, 01:41 PM
Barrykgerdes
Registered User

Barrykgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
If you look at the practicality of such as scheme it starts to look a bit ambitious. At 60,000 ft the coverage would be at least 200 km. Still requiring hundreds of balloons to give good coverage. You would need a special transponder on the ground (I bet Google would know how to charge for that)

The transponder and power unit could be mass produced quite cheaply. Even a suitable ballon would not be prohibitively expensive. The balloon would be charged with hydrogen to a level that would give neutral boyancy at 60,000 feet.

However the hydrogen molecules would slowly migrate through the fabric of the balloon requiring a supply of hydrogen to re-charge the system to keep it in orbit and in any case eventually the ballon will return slowly to earth (unless it bursts due to many causes), what fun!. (Wear your hard hats at all times)

Barry

PS I don't think it will ever happen past the experimental stage.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 18-06-2013, 11:21 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
You can't always believe the ABC.
What no Government based data to back up this story.
You may be spoofing the ABC. Who knows.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 22-06-2013, 10:33 PM
el_draco (Rom)
Politically incorrect.

el_draco is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by inline_online View Post
I'd be more concerned about this...

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-1...k-mofo/4758720
I just had to endure this rubbish. Pure and simple light pollution. The Mofo phallus.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-06-2013, 05:40 PM
BakerStreet's Avatar
BakerStreet (Allan)
Registered User

BakerStreet is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Toowoomba
Posts: 24
A big enough problem for optical imaging having stray objects floating by. Imagine the additional RF smog these will cause for radio astronomers.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement