Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 29-05-2013, 04:03 AM
U.K.Cowboy (Stuart)
Registered User

U.K.Cowboy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 340
Sun spots May 25th

After imaging Saturn for the last couple of months I decided to go for something a little brighter and higher in the sky so broke out the skymax 127 and sweated under a towel for an hour or so. These are only my 3rd ever Solar images so I'm not sure whether I've processed them properly and if my attempt at false colour is any good.

QHY5L cam used + Skymax 127 & Diagonal. 1.5x drizzle.

Comments and critique are welcome. Btw is an IR 742 filter of any use on this kind of imaging (white light)?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Drizzle15_15-11-23-921_g4_b3_ap26 GUESS.jpg)
33.8 KB19 views
Click for full-size image (Drizzle15_15-16-23-281-Part0000_g4_b3_ap5 GUESS.jpg)
77.2 KB18 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-05-2013, 07:17 PM
EricB's Avatar
EricB (Eric)
Waiting for good seeing!

EricB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 645
Hi Stuart,

Having no experience in solar, I can only congratulate you on your imaging effort.

Do you use Baader astro solar film?

My understanding is that a filter such as the Baader Solar Continuum in addition to the Baader film, would help getting a finer granulation.

Cheers,

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-05-2013, 09:32 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
nice work but try it at the base resolution as the image is not sharp. there is some interesting detail there. the urge to push the data to a larger scale is very tempting.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-05-2013, 04:01 AM
U.K.Cowboy (Stuart)
Registered User

U.K.Cowboy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 340
Thanks for the filter info Eric. Yes it is the Baader astro solar film I've used.

I've ordered a .5x focal reducer as my attempt at a full mosaic failed miserably. Although the QHY cam has a larger sensor the image scale being 1.5x larger than my DFK means the fov is not a lot better.

Thanks David I shall rein in the image scale as you say bigger is not always better and I may revert to a mono image as I feel that gives better contrast than trying to produce a false colour.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-05-2013, 08:57 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Good to see you branching out & diversifying Stuart. I'd say forget the drizzling until you cop some sweet seeing. For WL imaging with the Baader film, it is mandatory that an IR/UV cut be used with my DMK21/ED80 so I'm assuming you'd need to use one too. I tried it with no filtering of course..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-05-2013, 04:14 PM
U.K.Cowboy (Stuart)
Registered User

U.K.Cowboy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 340
Thanks John. I used the colour cam with IR/UV filter as I was horrified by the amount of dust on my mono sensor which I need to clean as my bulb blower failed to shift it I need to use cleaning fluid i.e lens cleaner?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement