Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-05-2013, 11:24 PM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 33S 150E (AU holiday)
Posts: 1,181
130mm mini Dob or 100mm APO ?

I have a Televue Genesis and am very happy with it as a travel scope. But the 13cm Skywatcher Heritage for only $189 is very tempting due to its larger aperture which means about 0.5 mag brighter, and portability (7 kg incl rockerbox). The Genesis + SP mount + tripod weighs 10kg and provides very crisp virtually color-free images.
What is the catch ? Central obstruction ? Less contrast ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-05-2013, 11:33 PM
AG Hybrid's Avatar
AG Hybrid (Adrian)
A Friendly Nyctophiliac

AG Hybrid is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toongabbie, NSW
Posts: 1,597
I would stick with the TV. A $189 reflector with only a smaller increase of aperture won't throw up a much brighter view.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-05-2013, 09:25 AM
astroboy's Avatar
astroboy
Registered User

astroboy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Bathurst NSW
Posts: 702
The advantages I see in the little dob is you don't need a separate tripod and mount so its light , compact and easy to use .
But like Adrian I would pick the TV for a better quality view .

Zane
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-05-2013, 10:28 AM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 4,994
They are very different beasties really.

The APO is a better scope, but you need to drag around other gear to use it (mount, tripod, batteries, cables, diagonals, [photo gear]). The Heritage is a 'plonk down on the table & use it' scope. Portability wise there's no comparison, is there.

Image quality wise, one's an APO refractor the other a Newtonian. Different optical systems. The trade off with the central obstruction of the Newt is that it will show no fainter stars than the refractor, despite the slight aperture gain.

A fast reflector can show coma. A fast refractor field curvature. Other than the mount, the differences are marginal (not knowing the quality of the mirror).

For me it comes to two things: mount & focuser size. Portable, the Heritage wins. But are you taking pics!? Focuser, the Heritage's is 1.25", I'm guessing the APO is 2" (?).

Do you want a grad'n'go (Hertiage) or photo capability (Genisis). That's what you need to decide for yourself. For me a "Travel scope" is a purely visual instrument. For others it's a small EQ photo rig. What do you want it for?

If you've got the Genisis already, the Heritage could be a nice complimentary ultra easy travel scope alternative. Heck, you've dropped a bundle on the Genisis & mounting it, & you're questioning the price of the Heritage?

Like I said, two very different beasties.

Mental.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-05-2013, 06:07 PM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 33S 150E (AU holiday)
Posts: 1,181
Thanks, I'll stick to the Genesis as this one is already Grab&Go as it weighs 11kg incl mount+ tripod and does not require a (sturdy) table and I can also 'plonk' it onto a Balinese beach or an outback desert.
The 2" vs 1.25 inch is not an issue, despite the Genesis is equipped with the 2" Starbrite mirror diagonal, I only have 1.25" (Televue) eyepieces and no bulky and heavy (but very good) Ethos jars.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement